PLTW vs XVPT: which paid, and which earned it?
PLTW and XVPT both write options for income. Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF and FT Vest PLTR & Target Income ETF.
10 pts behind PLTR
PLTW over 1 year: paid 37.9%, price −49.1%, total −7.5%, PLTR +2.5%, −10.0 pts.
PLTR
+2.5%
PLTW
−7.5%
10 pts behind PLTR
Total return, distributions reinvested
10 pts behind PLTR
PLTW over 1 year: paid 37.9%, price −49.1%, total −7.5%, PLTR +2.5%, −10.0 pts.
PLTR
+2.5%
PLTW
−7.5%
10 pts behind PLTR
37.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. PLTW over 1 year: paid 37.9%, price −49.1%, total −7.5%, PLTR +2.5%, −10.0 pts.
About even with PLTR
XVPT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −2.1%, total −2.1%, PLTR −2.5%, +0.4 pts.
PLTR
−2.5%
XVPT
−2.1%
about even with PLTR
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with PLTR
XVPT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −2.1%, total −2.1%, PLTR −2.5%, +0.4 pts.
PLTR
−2.5%
XVPT
−2.1%
about even with PLTR
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +2.5%. XVPT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −2.1%, total −2.1%, PLTR −2.5%, +0.4 pts.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PLTW and XVPT hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
16% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | PLTW | XVPT | PLTW | XVPT | PLTW | XVPT |
| 3 months | +56.2% | not published | 16.7% | not published | +7.5 pts | not published |
| 6 months | +27.1% | not published | 23.0% | not published | −0.6 pts | not published |
| 1 year | −7.5% | not published | 37.9% | not published | −10.0 pts | not published |
| Since launch PLTW Feb 2025 · XVPT Sep 2026 | +56.2% | −2.1% | 83.1% | 0.0% | −10.8 pts | +0.4 pts |
PLTW and XVPT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
PLTW and XVPT on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PLTW in plain words
Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, PLTW paid 37.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 49.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −7.5%. Palantir (PLTR) returned +2.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 67.8%, paid weekly.
XVPT in plain words
Over the period since launch on Sep 23, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, XVPT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.1%. Palantir (PLTR) returned −2.5% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, PLTW against XVPT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/pltw-vs-xvpt
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, PLTW against XVPT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/pltw-vs-xvpt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, PLTW against XVPT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/pltw-vs-xvpt
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). PLTW against XVPT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/pltw-vs-xvpt
- Markdown
- [PLTW against XVPT (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/pltw-vs-xvpt)