Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PLTW vs PLYY: which paid, and which earned it?

PLTW and PLYY both write options for income.

Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF and GraniteShares YieldBOOST PLTR ETF.

41.0%PLTW cash paid, 1 year
49.2%PLYY cash paid, 1 year
−8.9%PLTW total return, 1 year
−28.6%PLYY total return, 1 year
PLTW9.3 pts behind PLTR · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
PLTR+0.4%PLTW−8.9%9.3 pts behind PLTRTotal return, distributions reinvestedPLTR+0.4%PLTW−8.9%9.3 pts behind PLTR
PLYY25.9 pts behind PLTR · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
PLTR−2.7%PLYY−28.6%25.9 pts behind PLTRTotal return, distributions reinvestedPLTR−2.7%PLYY−28.6%25.9 pts behind PLTR

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, PLTW and PLYY hold 67% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions PLTW and PLYY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingPLTWPLYY
TREASURY BILL84.00%66.88%
Only in each
Only in PLTWOnly in PLYY
Palantir Technologies Inc 15.99%Treasury Bill 33.12%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

PLTW and PLYY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
PLTWPLYYPLTWPLYYPLTWPLYY
3 months+43.0%+0.6%15.1%12.6%+4.7 pts−37.7 pts
6 months+15.6%−14.5%22.0%23.9%−2.3 pts−32.4 pts
1 year−8.9%not published41.0%not published−9.3 ptsnot published
Since launch+46.7%−28.6%81.9%49.2%−11.8 pts−25.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PLTW and PLYY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PLTW
Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF
Option income on PLTR, paying weekly
PLYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST PLTR ETF
Synthetic covered call on PLTR, paying weekly
IssuerRoundhillGraniteShares
Strategyoption incomesynthetic covered call
BenchmarkPalantir (PLTR)Palantir (PLTR)
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized37.6%55.5%
Expense ratio0.99%1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year41.0%49.2% (since launch on Sep 23, 2025)
Price change, 1 year−50.7%−68.0%
Total return, 1 year−8.9%−28.6% (since launch on Sep 23, 2025)
Benchmark return, 1 year+0.4%−2.7%
Ahead or behind−9.3 pts−25.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published95%
Age576 days360 days
Net assets$127m$2m

PLTW in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, PLTW paid 41.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 50.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −8.9%. Palantir (PLTR) returned +0.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 37.6%, paid weekly.

PLYY in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 23, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, PLYY paid 49.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 68.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −28.6%. Palantir (PLTR) returned −2.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 25.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 55.5%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Aug 25, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, PLTW or PLYY?
PLTW charges 0.99% a year and PLYY charges 1.07%, so PLTW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PLTW against PLYY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PLTW against PLYY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/pltw-vs-plyy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources