Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PLA vs PLTW: which paid, and which earned it?

PLA and PLTW both write options for income.

GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF and Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF.

6.9%PLA cash paid, 1 year
41.0%PLTW cash paid, 1 year
+10.0%PLA total return, 1 year
−8.9%PLTW total return, 1 year
PLA21.3 pts behind PLTR · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
PLTR+31.3%PLA+10.0%6.9% as cash21.3 pts behind PLTRTotal return, distributions reinvestedPLTR+31.3%PLA+10.0%21.3 pts behind PLTR
PLTW9.3 pts behind PLTR · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
PLTR+0.4%PLTW−8.9%9.3 pts behind PLTRTotal return, distributions reinvestedPLTR+0.4%PLTW−8.9%9.3 pts behind PLTR

Performance, window by window

PLA and PLTW over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
PLAPLTWPLAPLTWPLAPLTW
3 months+11.1%+43.0%5.3%15.1%−27.2 pts+4.7 pts
6 monthsnot published+15.6%not published22.0%not published−2.3 pts
1 yearnot published−8.9%not published41.0%not published−9.3 pts
Since launch+10.0%+46.7%6.9%81.9%−21.3 pts−11.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PLA and PLTW on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PLA
GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF
Option income on PLTR, paying monthly
PLTW
Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF
Option income on PLTR, paying weekly
IssuerGraniteSharesRoundhill
Strategyoption incomeoption income
BenchmarkPalantir (PLTR)Palantir (PLTR)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized19.5%37.6%
Expense ratio1.07%0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year6.9% (since launch on May 19, 2026)41.0%
Price change, 1 year+2.7%−50.7%
Total return, 1 year+10.0% (since launch on May 19, 2026)−8.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year+31.3%+0.4%
Ahead or behind−21.3 pts−9.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age122 days576 days
Net assets$4m$127m

PLA in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, PLA paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.0%. Palantir (PLTR) returned +31.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 21.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.5%, paid monthly.

PLTW in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, PLTW paid 41.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 50.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −8.9%. Palantir (PLTR) returned +0.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 37.6%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, PLA or PLTW?
PLA charges 1.07% a year and PLTW charges 0.99%, so PLTW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PLA against PLTW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PLA against PLTW, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/pla-vs-pltw Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources