PLYY vs XVPT: which paid, and which earned it?
PLYY and XVPT both write options for income. GraniteShares YieldBOOST PLTR ETF and FT Vest PLTR & Target Income ETF.
31.3 pts behind PLTR
PLYY over 1 year: paid 47.7%, price −67.8%, total −28.8%, PLTR +2.5%, −31.3 pts.
PLTR
+2.5%
PLYY
−28.8%
31.3 pts behind PLTR
Total return, distributions reinvested
31.3 pts behind PLTR
PLYY over 1 year: paid 47.7%, price −67.8%, total −28.8%, PLTR +2.5%, −31.3 pts.
PLTR
+2.5%
PLYY
−28.8%
31.3 pts behind PLTR
47.7% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. PLYY over 1 year: paid 47.7%, price −67.8%, total −28.8%, PLTR +2.5%, −31.3 pts.
About even with PLTR
XVPT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −2.1%, total −2.1%, PLTR −2.5%, +0.4 pts.
PLTR
−2.5%
XVPT
−2.1%
about even with PLTR
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with PLTR
XVPT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −2.1%, total −2.1%, PLTR −2.5%, +0.4 pts.
PLTR
−2.5%
XVPT
−2.1%
about even with PLTR
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +2.5%. XVPT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −2.1%, total −2.1%, PLTR −2.5%, +0.4 pts.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PLYY and XVPT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | PLYY | XVPT | PLYY | XVPT | PLYY | XVPT |
| 3 months | +5.2% | not published | 13.0% | not published | −43.6 pts | not published |
| 6 months | −11.1% | not published | 24.0% | not published | −38.8 pts | not published |
| 1 year | −28.8% | not published | 47.7% | not published | −31.3 pts | not published |
| Since launch PLYY Sep 2025 · XVPT Sep 2026 | −27.5% | −2.1% | 49.5% | 0.0% | −29.9 pts | +0.4 pts |
PLYY and XVPT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
PLYY and XVPT on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PLYY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, PLYY paid 47.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 67.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −28.8%. Palantir (PLTR) returned +2.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 31.3 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 53.6%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 96% of the distribution paid Sep 1, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
XVPT in plain words
Over the period since launch on Sep 23, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, XVPT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.1%. Palantir (PLTR) returned −2.5% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, PLYY against XVPT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/plyy-vs-xvpt
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, PLYY against XVPT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/plyy-vs-xvpt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, PLYY against XVPT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/plyy-vs-xvpt
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). PLYY against XVPT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/plyy-vs-xvpt
- Markdown
- [PLYY against XVPT (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/plyy-vs-xvpt)