Data as of .
OMAH vs ROCY: which paid, and which earned it?
OMAH and ROCY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and ROCY hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | OMAH | ROCY |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc | 10.59% | 6.71% |
| Alphabet Inc | 4.57% | 5.33% |
| Bank of America Corp | 4.06% | 1.31% |
| American Express Co | 6.57% | 1.07% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc | 10.22% | 0.73% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The | 4.94% | 0.34% |
| Only in OMAH | Only in ROCY |
|---|---|
| VeriSign Inc 4.90% | NVIDIA Corp. 8.37% |
| Kroger Co/The 4.79% | Microsoft Corp. 4.97% |
| Chevron Corp 4.75% | Amazon.com, Inc. 4.15% |
| DAVITA INC 4.75% | Micron Technology, Inc. 3.00% |
| Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% | Broadcom, Inc. 2.61% |
| Alphabet Inc 4.54% | Meta Platforms, Inc. 2.43% |
| Chubb Ltd 4.49% | Wells Fargo & Co. 2.15% |
| Kraft Heinz Co/The 4.46% | Lam Research Corp. 1.76% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMAH | ROCY | OMAH | ROCY | OMAH | ROCY | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | +2.6% | 3.7% | 1.7% | −2.4 pts | +0.3 pts |
| 6 months | +8.8% | +14.8% | 7.7% | 3.7% | +2.8 pts | −3.3 pts |
| 1 year | +8.8% | not published | 14.4% | not published | +4.9 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +14.6% | +13.5% | 21.4% | 3.6% | +12.4 pts | −2.9 pts |
| OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | ROCY JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | JPMorgan |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.1% | 5.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.4% | 3.6% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −6.3% | +9.7% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.8% | +13.5% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +3.9% | +16.4% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.9 pts | −2.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 562 days | 183 days |
| Net assets | $1.1bn | $726m |
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
ROCY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ROCY paid 3.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, OMAH or ROCY?
- OMAH charges 0.98% a year and ROCY charges 0.35%, so ROCY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against ROCY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-rocy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.