Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DUBS vs ROCY: which paid, and which earned it?

DUBS and ROCY both write options for income.

Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF and JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF.

2.3%DUBS cash paid, 1 year
3.6%ROCY cash paid, 1 year
+20.3%DUBS total return, 1 year
+13.5%ROCY total return, 1 year
DUBS3.7 pts ahead of SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%DUBS+20.3%3.7 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%DUBS+20.3%3.7 pts ahead of SPY
ROCY2.9 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.4%ROCY+13.5%3.6% as cash2.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.4%ROCY+13.5%2.9 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DUBS and ROCY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in DUBSOnly in ROCY
State Street SPDR Portfolio S& 74.61%NVIDIA Corp. 8.37%
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core E 25.28%Apple, Inc. 6.71%
TREASURY BILL 0.11%Alphabet, Inc. 5.33%
Microsoft Corp. 4.97%
Amazon.com, Inc. 4.15%
Micron Technology, Inc. 3.00%
Broadcom, Inc. 2.61%
Meta Platforms, Inc. 2.43%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

DUBS and ROCY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
DUBSROCYDUBSROCYDUBSROCY
3 months+3.2%+2.6%0.5%1.7%+1.0 pts+0.3 pts
6 months+20.3%+14.8%1.2%3.7%+2.3 pts−3.3 pts
1 year+20.3%not published2.3%not published+3.7 ptsnot published
3 years+80.1%not published9.1%not published+1.7 ptsnot published
Since launch+84.4%+13.5%9.3%3.6%+2.4 pts−2.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DUBS and ROCY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
Option income on SPY, paying quarterly
ROCY
JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerAptusJPMorgan
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysquarterlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized2.1%5.7%
Expense ratio0.40%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year2.3%3.6% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026)
Price change, 1 year+17.6%+9.7%
Total return, 1 year+20.3%+13.5% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.4%
Ahead or behind+3.7 pts−2.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1192 days183 days
Net assets$353m$726m

DUBS in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 17.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 2.1%, paid quarterly.

ROCY in plain words

Over the period since launch on Mar 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ROCY paid 3.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.7%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, DUBS or ROCY?
DUBS charges 0.40% a year and ROCY charges 0.35%, so ROCY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DUBS against ROCY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DUBS against ROCY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dubs-vs-rocy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources