Data as of .
FTHI vs OMAH: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OMAH paid 14.4% of its price in cash against FTHI’s 8.9%, though FTHI returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OMAH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTHI and OMAH hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FTHI | OMAH |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc. | 7.75% | 10.59% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class A) | 2.41% | 4.57% |
| Bank of America Corporation | 2.22% | 4.06% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class C) | 1.74% | 4.54% |
| Chevron Corporation | 0.55% | 4.75% |
| The Coca-Cola Company | 0.54% | 4.94% |
| Chubb Limited | 0.47% | 4.49% |
| Only in FTHI | Only in OMAH |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corporation 6.90% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% |
| US Dollar 5.90% | American Express Co 6.57% |
| Microsoft Corporation 2.94% | VeriSign Inc 4.90% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2.67% | Kroger Co/The 4.79% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 2.53% | DAVITA INC 4.75% |
| Dell Technologies Inc. (Class C) 2.52% | Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% |
| ASML Holding N.V. (New York Registry Sha 2.17% | Kraft Heinz Co/The 4.46% |
| Broadcom Inc. 2.01% | Moody's Corp 4.42% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHI | OMAH | FTHI | OMAH | FTHI | OMAH | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | +1.7% | 2.2% | 3.7% | −0.6 pts | −2.4 pts |
| 6 months | +9.8% | +8.8% | 4.6% | 7.7% | −8.2 pts | +2.8 pts |
| 1 year | +9.7% | +8.8% | 8.9% | 14.4% | −6.9 pts | +4.9 pts |
| 3 years | +47.9% | not published | 28.9% | not published | −30.5 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +156.3% | +14.6% | 82.6% | 21.4% | −257.8 pts | +12.4 pts |
| FTHI First Trust BuyWrite Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | VistaShares |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 9.0% | 15.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.9% | 14.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +0.3% | −6.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.7% | +8.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +3.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −6.9 pts | +4.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 4637 days | 562 days |
| Net assets | $2.5bn | $1.1bn |
FTHI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FTHI paid 8.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.7%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.0%, paid monthly.
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, FTHI or OMAH?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FTHI paid 8.9% of its starting price in cash and OMAH paid 14.4%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, FTHI or OMAH?
- With every distribution reinvested, FTHI returned +9.7% and OMAH returned +8.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so FTHI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FTHI or OMAH?
- FTHI charges 0.75% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so FTHI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTHI against OMAH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fthi-vs-omah Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.