Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

OMAH vs XYLD: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year OMAH paid 14.4% of its price in cash against XYLD’s 11.0%, though XYLD returned more with it reinvested.

VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF.

14.4%OMAH cash paid, 1 year
11.0%XYLD cash paid, 1 year
+8.8%OMAH total return, 1 year
+17.9%XYLD total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XYLD scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

OMAH 65.2XYLD 79.53.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

OMAH4.9 pts ahead of BRK-B · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
BRK-B+3.9%OMAH+8.8%14.4% of it arrived as cash4.9 pts ahead of BRK-BTotal return, distributions reinvestedBRK-B+3.9%OMAH+8.8%4.9 pts ahead of BRK-B
XYLD1.4 pts ahead of SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%XYLD+17.9%11.0% of it arrived as cash1.4 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%XYLD+17.9%11.0% cash1.4 pts ahead of SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and XYLD hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions OMAH and XYLD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingOMAHXYLD
Apple Inc10.59%7.55%
Alphabet Inc4.57%3.13%
Alphabet Inc4.54%2.49%
Chevron Corp4.75%0.64%
Bank of America Corp4.06%0.57%
Coca-Cola Co/The4.94%0.52%
American Express Co6.57%0.26%
Chubb Ltd4.49%0.18%
Moody's Corp4.42%0.11%
Delta Air Lines Inc4.13%0.08%
Occidental Petroleum Corp4.64%0.07%
Kroger Co/The4.79%0.05%
Only in each
Only in OMAHOnly in XYLD
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22%NVIDIA CORP 8.24%
Sirius XM Holdings Inc 4.29%MICROSOFT CORP 5.61%
New York Times Co/The 2.80%AMAZON.COM INC 3.83%
Ally Financial Inc 2.44%BROADCOM INC 2.62%
Liberty Live Holdings Inc 2.14%META PLATFORMS INC 2.26%
BRKB US 09/25/26 P512.5 0.10%MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.77%
VRSN US 10/16/26 C310 0.10%TESLA INC 1.58%
LLYVK US 10/16/26 C105 0.06%BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC-CL B 1.46%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

OMAH and XYLD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
OMAHXYLDOMAHXYLDOMAHXYLD
3 months+1.7%+4.5%3.7%2.6%−2.4 pts+2.3 pts
6 months+8.8%+12.4%7.7%5.6%+2.8 pts−5.6 pts
1 year+8.8%+17.9%14.4%11.0%+4.9 pts+1.4 pts
3 yearsnot published+44.5%not published32.5%not published−33.9 pts
Since launch+14.6%+191.5%21.4%112.9%+12.4 pts−315.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
OMAH and XYLD on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
OMAH
VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF
Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerVistaSharesGlobal X
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkBerkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized15.1%8.9%
Expense ratio0.98%0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year14.4%11.0%
Price change, 1 year−6.3%+5.9%
Total return, 1 year+8.8%+17.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year+3.9%+16.6%
Ahead or behind+4.9 pts+1.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published93%
Age562 days4834 days
Net assets$1.1bn$3.4bn

OMAH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.

XYLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XYLD paid 11.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.9%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, OMAH or XYLD?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting price in cash and XYLD paid 11.0%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, OMAH or XYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, OMAH returned +8.8% and XYLD returned +17.9% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XYLD returned more.
Which is cheaper, OMAH or XYLD?
OMAH charges 0.98% a year and XYLD charges 0.60%, so XYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

OMAH against XYLD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against XYLD, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-xyld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources