Data as of .
DIVO vs OMAH: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OMAH paid 14.4% of its price in cash against DIVO’s 6.8%, though DIVO returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DIVO scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DIVO and OMAH hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DIVO | OMAH |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc | 5.49% | 10.59% |
| Chevron Corp | 4.67% | 4.75% |
| American Express Co | 4.01% | 6.57% |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.15% | 4.57% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The | 1.95% | 4.94% |
| Only in DIVO | Only in OMAH |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp 5.97% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% |
| Caterpillar Inc 5.34% | VeriSign Inc 4.90% |
| Visa Inc 5.15% | Kroger Co/The 4.79% |
| Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12 5.02% | DAVITA INC 4.75% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 4.90% | Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% |
| Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 4.76% | Alphabet Inc 4.54% |
| Amgen Inc 4.74% | Chubb Ltd 4.49% |
| State Street Consumer Discretionary Sele 4.53% | Kraft Heinz Co/The 4.46% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIVO | OMAH | DIVO | OMAH | DIVO | OMAH | |
| 3 months | +4.5% | +1.7% | 1.2% | 3.7% | +2.3 pts | −2.4 pts |
| 6 months | +9.4% | +8.8% | 2.5% | 7.7% | −8.6 pts | +2.8 pts |
| 1 year | +14.6% | +8.8% | 6.8% | 14.4% | −2.0 pts | +4.9 pts |
| 3 years | +56.1% | not published | 19.1% | not published | −22.3 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +218.8% | +14.6% | 72.4% | 21.4% | −76.3 pts | +12.4 pts |
| DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SPY, paying monthly | OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Amplify | VistaShares |
| Strategy | dividend stocks with call overlay | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 4.9% | 15.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.56% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.8% | 14.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +7.3% | −6.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.6% | +8.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +3.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.0 pts | +4.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 3565 days | 562 days |
| Net assets | $7.8bn | $1.1bn |
DIVO in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DIVO paid 6.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.9%, paid monthly.
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, DIVO or OMAH?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DIVO paid 6.8% of its starting price in cash and OMAH paid 14.4%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, DIVO or OMAH?
- With every distribution reinvested, DIVO returned +14.6% and OMAH returned +8.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DIVO returned more.
- Which is cheaper, DIVO or OMAH?
- DIVO charges 0.56% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so DIVO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DIVO against OMAH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/divo-vs-omah Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.