Data as of .
OMAH vs PBP: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OMAH paid 14.4% of its price in cash against PBP’s 11.8%, though PBP returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: PBP scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and PBP hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | OMAH | PBP |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc | 10.59% | 7.50% |
| Alphabet Inc | 4.57% | 3.11% |
| Alphabet Inc | 4.54% | 2.47% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc | 10.22% | 1.42% |
| Chevron Corp | 4.75% | 0.59% |
| Bank of America Corp | 4.06% | 0.57% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The | 4.94% | 0.52% |
| American Express Co | 6.57% | 0.25% |
| Chubb Ltd | 4.49% | 0.19% |
| Moody's Corp | 4.42% | 0.11% |
| Delta Air Lines Inc | 4.13% | 0.08% |
| Occidental Petroleum Corp | 4.64% | 0.07% |
| Only in OMAH | Only in PBP |
|---|---|
| Sirius XM Holdings Inc 4.29% | NVIDIA Corp 8.18% |
| New York Times Co/The 2.80% | Microsoft Corp 5.57% |
| Ally Financial Inc 2.44% | Amazon.com Inc 3.77% |
| Liberty Live Holdings Inc 2.14% | Broadcom Inc 2.57% |
| BRKB US 09/25/26 P512.5 0.10% | Meta Platforms Inc 2.22% |
| VRSN US 10/16/26 C310 0.10% | Micron Technology Inc 1.74% |
| LLYVK US 10/16/26 C105 0.06% | Tesla Inc 1.56% |
| AAPL US 09/25/26 C342.5 0.05% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.42% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 19, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMAH | PBP | OMAH | PBP | OMAH | PBP | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | +5.0% | 3.7% | 2.8% | −2.4 pts | +2.7 pts |
| 6 months | +8.8% | +13.0% | 7.7% | 5.7% | +2.8 pts | −5.0 pts |
| 1 year | +8.8% | +18.5% | 14.4% | 11.8% | +4.9 pts | +1.9 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +46.1% | not published | 31.8% | not published | −32.3 pts |
| Since launch | +14.6% | +199.0% | 21.4% | 101.2% | +12.4 pts | −604.5 pts |
| OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | Invesco |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.1% | 11.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 0.29% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.4% | 11.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | −6.3% | +5.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.8% | +18.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +3.9% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.9 pts | +1.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 562 days | 6101 days |
| Net assets | $1.1bn | $386m |
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
PBP in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, PBP paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, OMAH or PBP?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting price in cash and PBP paid 11.8%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, OMAH or PBP?
- With every distribution reinvested, OMAH returned +8.8% and PBP returned +18.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so PBP returned more.
- Which is cheaper, OMAH or PBP?
- OMAH charges 0.98% a year and PBP charges 0.29%, so PBP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against PBP, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-pbp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.