Data as of .
PBP vs ROCY: which paid, and which earned it?
PBP and ROCY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PBP and ROCY hold 57% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | PBP | ROCY |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 8.18% | 8.37% |
| Apple Inc | 7.50% | 6.71% |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.57% | 4.97% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 3.77% | 4.15% |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.11% | 5.33% |
| Broadcom Inc | 2.57% | 2.61% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 2.22% | 2.43% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 1.74% | 3.00% |
| Tesla Inc | 1.56% | 1.55% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.39% | 1.69% |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 1.38% | 1.47% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc | 1.42% | 0.73% |
| Only in PBP | Only in ROCY |
|---|---|
| Alphabet Inc 2.47% | Exxon Mobil Corp. 1.63% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.42% | ASML Holding NV 0.57% |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 1.03% | Performance Food Group Co. 0.50% |
| Visa Inc 0.93% | Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. 0.34% |
| Cisco Systems Inc 0.66% | Elanco Animal Health, Inc. 0.33% |
| Chevron Corp 0.59% | First Citizens BancShares, Inc. 0.31% |
| Caterpillar Inc 0.56% | BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. 0.29% |
| Merck & Co Inc 0.55% | Fidelity National Information Services, 0.16% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 19, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBP | ROCY | PBP | ROCY | PBP | ROCY | |
| 3 months | +5.0% | +2.6% | 2.8% | 1.7% | +2.7 pts | +0.3 pts |
| 6 months | +13.0% | +14.8% | 5.7% | 3.7% | −5.0 pts | −3.3 pts |
| 1 year | +18.5% | not published | 11.8% | not published | +1.9 pts | not published |
| 3 years | +46.1% | not published | 31.8% | not published | −32.3 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +199.0% | +13.5% | 101.2% | 3.6% | −604.5 pts | −2.9 pts |
| PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | ROCY JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Invesco | JPMorgan |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 11.3% | 5.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.8% | 3.6% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | +5.5% | +9.7% |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.5% | +13.5% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +16.4% |
| Ahead or behind | +1.9 pts | −2.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 6101 days | 183 days |
| Net assets | $386m | $726m |
PBP in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, PBP paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.3%, paid monthly.
ROCY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ROCY paid 3.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, PBP or ROCY?
- PBP charges 0.29% a year and ROCY charges 0.35%, so PBP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, PBP against ROCY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/pbp-vs-rocy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.