Which paid more, OARK or OMAH?

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OARK paid 33.3% of its starting price in cash and OMAH paid 14.7%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, OARK or OMAH?

With every distribution reinvested, OARK returned −2.6% and OMAH +13.5% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, OARK or OMAH?

OARK charges 1.00% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so OMAH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

OARK vs OMAH: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OARK paid 33.3% of its price in cash against OMAH’s 14.7%, though OMAH returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about OARK and OMAH

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $38m for YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF and $1.1bn for VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF.

OARK on its own →OMAH on its own →

At a glance

33.3%

OARK cash paid, 1 year

14.7%

OMAH cash paid, 1 year

−2.6%

OARK total return, 1 year

+13.5%

OMAH total return, 1 year

OARK · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.1 pts ahead of ARKK

OARK

−2.6%

ARKK

−3.7%

1.1 pts ahead of ARKK

OARK over 1 year: paid 33.3%, price −36.6%, total −2.6%, ARKK −3.7%, +1.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

ARKK

−3.7%

OARK

−2.6%

1.1 pts ahead of ARKK

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.1 pts ahead of ARKK

OARK over 1 year: paid 33.3%, price −36.6%, total −2.6%, ARKK −3.7%, +1.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

ARKK

−3.7%

OARK

−2.6%

1.1 pts ahead of ARKK

33.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. OARK over 1 year: paid 33.3%, price −36.6%, total −2.6%, ARKK −3.7%, +1.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

OMAH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.3 pts behind SPY

OMAH

+13.5%

SPY

+14.8%

1.3 pts behind SPY

OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

OMAH

+13.5%

14.7% of it arrived as cash

1.3 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.3 pts behind SPY

OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

OMAH

+13.5%

14.7% as cash

1.3 pts behind SPY

14.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

OMAH costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.1 points; OMAH is far larger, $1.1bn against $38m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

OARK vs OMAH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	OARK	OMAH
Paid and earned
Measure	OARK	OMAH
Total return, 1 year	−2.6%	+13.5%
Price change, 1 year	fell 36.6%	fell 2.4%
Return of capital, issuer estimate		100% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	OARK	OMAH
Benchmark	ARK Innovation ETF, measured through ARKK	S&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Measure	OARK	OMAH
Expense ratio	1.00%	0.98%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$38m	$1.1bn
Holdings
Measure	OARK	OMAH
Holdings in common	0%

ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · OMAH scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?

IQ Income Score15.3OARK53OMAH

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

OARK 15.3

OMAH 53

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, OARK and OMAH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first OARK OMAH

Only in one fund ↓

Only in OARK

United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.375% 09/15/2027 31.70%

United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 25.99%

2ARKK US 11/20/26 C85.01 FLX 1.48%

ARKK US 11/06/26 C83 0.25%

ARKK US 11/06/26 C84 0.07%

ARKK US 11/06/26 C82 -0.16%

ARKK US 11/06/26 C81 -0.68%

2ARKK US 11/20/26 P85.01 FLX -7.39%

Only in OMAH

Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.99%

Apple Inc 10.43%

American Express Co 6.64%

Kroger Co 5.21%

Coca-Cola Co 5.08%

Sirius XM Holdings Inc 4.97%

VeriSign Inc 4.86%

Moody's Corp 4.72%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

OARK YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF · Synthetic covered call on ARKK, paying weekly OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly

Issuer YieldMax VistaShares

Strategy synthetic covered call covered call

Benchmark ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) S&P 500 (SPY)

Pays weekly monthly

Payout rate, annualized 31.8% 15.0%

Expense ratio 1.00% 0.98%

Cash paid, 1 year 33.3% 14.7%

Price change, 1 year −36.6% −2.4%

Total return, 1 year −2.6% +13.5%

Benchmark return, 1 year −3.7% +14.8%

Ahead or behind +1.1 pts −1.3 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published 100%

Age 3.9 years 1.7 years

Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $38m $1.1bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: OARK vs OMAH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	OARK	OMAH	OARK	OMAH	OARK	OMAH
3 months	+1.6%	+2.5%	8.3%	3.7%	−3.9 pts	+2.6 pts
6 months	−2.3%	+6.2%	17.8%	7.4%	−3.3 pts	+1.2 pts
1 year	−2.6%	+13.5%	33.3%	14.7%	+1.1 pts	−1.3 pts
3 years	+62.6%	–	95.8%	–	−36.1 pts	–
Since launchNot the same days: OARK Nov 2022 · OMAH Mar 2025	+47.8%	+19.2%	90.4%	23.7%	−75.3 pts	−14.9 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

OARK

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OARK paid 33.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 36.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.6%. ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) returned −3.7% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.1 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 31.8%, paid weekly.

OMAH

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OMAH paid 14.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.0%, paid monthly. VistaShares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, OARK or OMAH?: Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OARK paid 33.3% of its starting price in cash and OMAH paid 14.7%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, OARK or OMAH?: With every distribution reinvested, OARK returned −2.6% and OMAH +13.5% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, OARK or OMAH?: OARK charges 1.00% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so OMAH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

OARK vs ROCY OARK vs BALI OARK vs XYLD OARK vs DIVO OMAH vs SIOO OMAH vs YQQQ OMAH vs XSHP OMAH vs PCOV

Where to next

ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) →S&P 500 (SPY) →OARK on its own →OMAH on its own →OARK dividend history →OARK holdings →OMAH dividend history →OMAH holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

OARK filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

OARK prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

OARK 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

YieldMax page for OARK ↗

OMAH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

OMAH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

OMAH 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

VistaShares page for OMAH ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, OARK against OMAH, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/oark-vs-omah

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.