Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
OMAH vs SIOO: Dividend Yield & Total Return
OMAH and SIOO both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about OMAH and SIOO
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $1.1bn for VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF and $25m for VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF.
1.3 pts behind SPY
OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
OMAH
+13.5%
14.7% of it arrived as cash
1.3 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.3 pts behind SPY
OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
OMAH
+13.5%
14.7% as cash
1.3 pts behind SPY
14.7% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.About even with OEF
SIOO since launch: paid 13.6%, price −3.6%, total +10.8%, OEF +10.9%, −0.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
OEF
+10.9%
SIOO
+10.8%
13.6% of it arrived as cash
about even with OEF
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with OEF
SIOO since launch: paid 13.6%, price −3.6%, total +10.8%, OEF +10.9%, −0.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
OEF
+10.9%
SIOO
+10.8%
13.6% as cash
about even with OEF
13.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SIOO since launch: paid 13.6%, price −3.6%, total +10.8%, OEF +10.9%, −0.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
SIOO costs 0.39 points a year less; OMAH is far larger, $1.1bn against $25m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | OMAH | SIOO |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.5% | not published |
| Price change | fell 2.4% (1 year) | fell 3.6% (since Dec 11, 2025) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment | 97% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | S&P 500, measured through SPY | S&P 100, measured through OEF |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $1.1bn | $25m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 17% | |
Risk and return
Dec 19, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 45 weekly returnsFrom Dec 2025 to Oct 2026, SIOO returned slightly more: +9.9% to +9.3%. OMAH fell less at its worst: −4.5% to −6.3%.
Full scorecard
3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | OMAH | SIOO | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +9.3% | +9.9% | SIOO (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Price return | −4.8% | −4.4% | SIOO (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Max drawdown | −4.5% | −6.3% | OMAH | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 45 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and SIOO hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.
half
17% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | OMAH | SIOO | OMAH | SIOO | OMAH | SIOO |
| 3 months | +2.5% | +0.8% | 3.7% | 3.7% | +2.6 pts | +1.0 pts |
| 6 months | +6.2% | +5.6% | 7.4% | 7.5% | +1.2 pts | +1.1 pts |
| 1 year | +13.5% | – | 14.7% | – | −1.3 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: OMAH Mar 2025 · SIOO Dec 2025 | +19.2% | +10.8% | 23.7% | 13.6% | −14.9 pts | −0.1 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for SIOO.
OMAH
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OMAH paid 14.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.0%, paid monthly. VistaShares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
SIOO
Over the period from its first trade on Dec 11, 2025 to Nov 4, 2026, SIOO paid 13.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.8%. S&P 100 (OEF) returned +10.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.4%, paid monthly. VistaShares estimates that 97% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, OMAH against SIOO, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-sioo
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). OMAH against SIOO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-sioo
[OMAH against SIOO (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-sioo)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.