Data as of .
OMAH vs SIOO: which paid, and which earned it?
OMAH and SIOO both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and SIOO hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | OMAH | SIOO |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc | 10.59% | 9.24% |
| Alphabet Inc | 4.54% | 3.62% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc | 10.22% | 2.03% |
| Chevron Corp | 4.75% | 0.86% |
| Bank of America Corp | 4.06% | 0.85% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The | 4.94% | 0.76% |
| American Express Co | 6.57% | 0.34% |
| Alphabet Inc | 4.57% | 0.21% |
| Only in OMAH | Only in SIOO |
|---|---|
| VeriSign Inc 4.90% | NVIDIA Corp 9.83% |
| Kroger Co/The 4.79% | United States Treasury Bill 12/10/2026 7.85% |
| DAVITA INC 4.75% | Microsoft Corp 5.91% |
| Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% | Amazon.com Inc 4.41% |
| Chubb Ltd 4.49% | Broadcom Inc 3.57% |
| Kraft Heinz Co/The 4.46% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.12% |
| Moody's Corp 4.42% | Micron Technology Inc 2.37% |
| Sirius XM Holdings Inc 4.29% | Tesla Inc 2.23% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMAH | SIOO | OMAH | SIOO | OMAH | SIOO | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | +4.0% | 3.7% | 3.7% | −2.4 pts | +0.7 pts |
| 6 months | +8.8% | +14.3% | 7.7% | 7.9% | +2.8 pts | −5.8 pts |
| 1 year | +8.8% | not published | 14.4% | not published | +4.9 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +14.6% | +10.8% | 21.4% | 11.1% | +12.4 pts | −0.2 pts |
| OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF Covered call on OEF, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | VistaShares |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy | S&P 100 (OEF) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.1% | 15.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | not published |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.4% | 11.1% (since launch on Dec 11, 2025) |
| Price change, 1 year | −6.3% | −1.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.8% | +10.8% (since launch on Dec 11, 2025) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +3.9% | +11.0% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.9 pts | −0.2 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 562 days | 281 days |
| Net assets | $1.1bn | $21m |
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
SIOO in plain words
Over the period since launch on Dec 11, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, SIOO paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.8%. S&P 100 (OEF) returned +11.0% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against SIOO, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-sioo Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.