Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

OMAH vs YQQQ: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year YQQQ paid 23.1% of its price in cash against OMAH’s 14.4%, though OMAH returned more with it reinvested.

VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF and YieldMax(R) Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF.

14.4%OMAH cash paid, 1 year
23.1%YQQQ cash paid, 1 year
+8.8%OMAH total return, 1 year
−3.5%YQQQ total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OMAH scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

OMAH 65.2YQQQ 7.53.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

OMAH4.9 pts ahead of BRK-B · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
BRK-B+3.9%OMAH+8.8%14.4% of it arrived as cash4.9 pts ahead of BRK-BTotal return, distributions reinvestedBRK-B+3.9%OMAH+8.8%4.9 pts ahead of BRK-B
YQQQ25.3 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%YQQQ−3.5%25.3 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%YQQQ−3.5%25.3 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and YQQQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in OMAHOnly in YQQQ
Apple Inc 10.59%TREASURY BILL 27.63%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22%TREASURY BILL 25.80%
American Express Co 6.57%TREASURY BILL 19.43%
Coca-Cola Co/The 4.94%TREASURY BILL 15.20%
VeriSign Inc 4.90%TREASURY BILL 11.95%
Kroger Co/The 4.79%
Chevron Corp 4.75%
DAVITA INC 4.75%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

OMAH and YQQQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
OMAHYQQQOMAHYQQQOMAHYQQQ
3 months+1.7%+5.8%3.7%6.5%−2.4 pts+8.3 pts
6 months+8.8%−13.9%7.7%10.8%+2.8 pts−38.2 pts
1 year+8.8%−3.5%14.4%23.1%+4.9 pts−25.3 pts
Since launch+14.6%−17.6%21.4%37.0%+12.4 pts−71.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
OMAH and YQQQ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
OMAH
VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF
Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly
YQQQ
YieldMax(R) Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
IssuerVistaSharesYieldMax
Strategycovered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkBerkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxyNasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized15.1%21.3%
Expense ratio0.98%1.11%
Cash paid, 1 year14.4%23.1%
Price change, 1 year−6.3%−25.7%
Total return, 1 year+8.8%−3.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+3.9%+21.8%
Ahead or behind+4.9 pts−25.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published0%
Age562 days764 days
Net assets$1.1bn$27m

OMAH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.

YQQQ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YQQQ paid 23.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 25.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 21.3%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, OMAH or YQQQ?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting price in cash and YQQQ paid 23.1%, so YQQQ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, OMAH or YQQQ?
With every distribution reinvested, OMAH returned +8.8% and YQQQ returned −3.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so OMAH returned more.
Which is cheaper, OMAH or YQQQ?
OMAH charges 0.98% a year and YQQQ charges 1.11%, so OMAH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

OMAH against YQQQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against YQQQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-yqqq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources