Data as of .
OMAH vs PCOV: which paid, and which earned it?
OMAH and PCOV both write options for income.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMAH | PCOV | OMAH | PCOV | OMAH | PCOV | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | not published | 3.7% | not published | −2.4 pts | not published |
| 6 months | +8.8% | not published | 7.7% | not published | +2.8 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +8.8% | not published | 14.4% | not published | +4.9 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +14.6% | −3.7% | 21.4% | 0.0% | +12.4 pts | −3.0 pts |
| OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | PCOV Principal Equity Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | Principal |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | not established |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.1% | not published |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 0.34% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.4% | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 19, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −6.3% | −3.7% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.8% | −3.7% (since launch on Aug 19, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +3.9% | −0.7% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.9 pts | −3.0 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 562 days | 30 days |
| Net assets | $1.1bn | not published |
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
PCOV in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, PCOV paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −0.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.0 pts.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, OMAH or PCOV?
- OMAH charges 0.98% a year and PCOV charges 0.34%, so PCOV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against PCOV, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-pcov Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.