Data as of .
OMAH vs PAPI: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OMAH paid 14.4% of its price in cash against PAPI’s 7.9%, though PAPI returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OMAH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and PAPI hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | OMAH | PAPI |
|---|---|---|
| Alphabet Inc | 4.57% | 0.59% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The | 4.94% | 0.56% |
| Kraft Heinz Co/The | 4.46% | 0.56% |
| New York Times Co/The | 2.80% | 0.47% |
| Chevron Corp | 4.75% | 0.45% |
| Lennar Corp | 2.13% | 0.41% |
| Only in OMAH | Only in PAPI |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc 10.59% | Corning, Inc. 1.01% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% | TD SYNNEX Corp. 0.81% |
| American Express Co 6.57% | Cisco Systems, Inc. 0.77% |
| VeriSign Inc 4.90% | Power Integrations, Inc. 0.73% |
| Kroger Co/The 4.79% | Royalty Pharma plc 0.73% |
| DAVITA INC 4.75% | Millicom International Cellular SA 0.72% |
| Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% | Avnet, Inc. 0.71% |
| Alphabet Inc 4.54% | Texas Instruments, Inc. 0.71% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMAH | PAPI | OMAH | PAPI | OMAH | PAPI | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | +4.7% | 3.7% | 2.0% | −2.4 pts | +2.5 pts |
| 6 months | +8.8% | +5.6% | 7.7% | 4.0% | +2.8 pts | −12.4 pts |
| 1 year | +8.8% | +12.8% | 14.4% | 7.9% | +4.9 pts | −3.8 pts |
| Since launch | +14.6% | +35.6% | 21.4% | 22.5% | +12.4 pts | −49.6 pts |
| OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | PAPI Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | Parametric |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.1% | 7.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 0.29% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.4% | 7.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | −6.3% | +4.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.8% | +12.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +3.9% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.9 pts | −3.8 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 562 days | 1065 days |
| Net assets | $1.1bn | $400m |
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
PAPI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, PAPI paid 7.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.2%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, OMAH or PAPI?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting price in cash and PAPI paid 7.9%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, OMAH or PAPI?
- With every distribution reinvested, OMAH returned +8.8% and PAPI returned +12.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so PAPI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, OMAH or PAPI?
- OMAH charges 0.98% a year and PAPI charges 0.29%, so PAPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against PAPI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-papi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.