Data as of .
OMAH vs RDVI: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OMAH paid 14.4% of its price in cash against RDVI’s 8.8%, though RDVI returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OMAH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and RDVI hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | OMAH | RDVI |
|---|---|---|
| Bank of America Corp | 4.06% | 2.03% |
| Chubb Ltd | 4.49% | 2.02% |
| Alphabet Inc | 4.57% | 1.97% |
| American Express Co | 6.57% | 1.80% |
| Apple Inc | 10.59% | 1.66% |
| Only in OMAH | Only in RDVI |
|---|---|
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% | Lam Research Corporation 2.31% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The 4.94% | Applied Materials, Inc. 2.30% |
| VeriSign Inc 4.90% | The Travelers Companies, Inc. 2.27% |
| Kroger Co/The 4.79% | The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation 2.22% |
| Chevron Corp 4.75% | GE Vernova Inc. 2.19% |
| DAVITA INC 4.75% | Micron Technology, Inc. 2.18% |
| Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% | KLA Corporation 2.16% |
| Alphabet Inc 4.54% | NVIDIA Corporation 2.16% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMAH | RDVI | OMAH | RDVI | OMAH | RDVI | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | +0.3% | 3.7% | 2.1% | −2.4 pts | −6.3 pts |
| 6 months | +8.8% | +15.1% | 7.7% | 4.6% | +2.8 pts | +2.5 pts |
| 1 year | +8.8% | +19.2% | 14.4% | 8.8% | +4.9 pts | −8.0 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +69.2% | not published | 29.6% | not published | +15.5 pts |
| Since launch | +14.6% | +101.2% | 21.4% | 41.0% | +12.4 pts | +32.0 pts |
| OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | RDVI FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | First Trust |
| Strategy | covered call | dividend stocks with call overlay |
| Benchmark | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.1% | 8.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 0.75% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.4% | 8.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | −6.3% | +9.6% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.8% | +19.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +3.9% | +27.2% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.9 pts | −8.0 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 562 days | 1429 days |
| Net assets | $1.1bn | $3.7bn |
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
RDVI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, RDVI paid 8.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.2%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, OMAH or RDVI?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting price in cash and RDVI paid 8.8%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, OMAH or RDVI?
- With every distribution reinvested, OMAH returned +8.8% and RDVI returned +19.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so RDVI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, OMAH or RDVI?
- OMAH charges 0.98% a year and RDVI charges 0.75%, so RDVI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against RDVI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-rdvi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.