Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

FEPI vs OMAH: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year FEPI paid 23.4% of its price in cash against OMAH’s 14.4%, and returned more with it reinvested.

REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF and VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF.

23.4%FEPI cash paid, 1 year
14.4%OMAH cash paid, 1 year
+15.7%FEPI total return, 1 year
+8.8%OMAH total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OMAH scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

FEPI 33.5OMAH 65.23.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

FEPI6.1 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%FEPI+15.7%23.4% of it arrived as cash6.1 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%FEPI+15.7%23.4% as cash6.1 pts behind QQQ
OMAH4.9 pts ahead of BRK-B · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
BRK-B+3.9%OMAH+8.8%14.4% of it arrived as cash4.9 pts ahead of BRK-BTotal return, distributions reinvestedBRK-B+3.9%OMAH+8.8%4.9 pts ahead of BRK-B

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FEPI and OMAH hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FEPI and OMAH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFEPIOMAH
APPLE INC.5.14%10.59%
ALPHABET INC.8.83%4.57%
Only in each
Only in FEPIOnly in OMAH
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 9.98%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 8.91%American Express Co 6.57%
BROADCOM INC. 8.05%Coca-Cola Co/The 4.94%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 7.76%VeriSign Inc 4.90%
TESLA, INC. 7.47%Kroger Co/The 4.79%
INTEL CORPORATION 5.24%Chevron Corp 4.75%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.21%DAVITA INC 4.75%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.19%Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

FEPI and OMAH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
FEPIOMAHFEPIOMAHFEPIOMAH
3 months+2.9%+1.7%6.0%3.7%+5.4 pts−2.4 pts
6 months+17.2%+8.8%12.8%7.7%−7.1 pts+2.8 pts
1 year+15.7%+8.8%23.4%14.4%−6.1 pts+4.9 pts
Since launch+69.0%+14.6%66.8%21.4%−28.5 pts+12.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FEPI and OMAH on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FEPI
REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
OMAH
VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF
Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly
IssuerREXVistaShares
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxyBerkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized24.9%15.1%
Expense ratio0.65%0.98%
Cash paid, 1 year23.4%14.4%
Price change, 1 year−10.0%−6.3%
Total return, 1 year+15.7%+8.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+3.9%
Ahead or behind−6.1 pts+4.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1073 days562 days
Net assets$710m$1.1bn

FEPI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FEPI paid 23.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.9%, paid weekly.

OMAH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FEPI or OMAH?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FEPI paid 23.4% of its starting price in cash and OMAH paid 14.4%, so FEPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FEPI or OMAH?
With every distribution reinvested, FEPI returned +15.7% and OMAH returned +8.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so FEPI returned more.
Which is cheaper, FEPI or OMAH?
FEPI charges 0.65% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so FEPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FEPI against OMAH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FEPI against OMAH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fepi-vs-omah Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources