Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
FEPI vs OMAH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FEPI paid 22.1% of its price in cash against OMAH’s 14.7%, though OMAH returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FEPI and OMAH
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $679m for REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF and $1.1bn for VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF.
Not measured
FEPI over 1 year: paid 22.1%, price −19.3%, total +2.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
FEPI
+2.9%
22.1% as cash
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
FEPI over 1 year: paid 22.1%, price −19.3%, total +2.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
FEPI
+2.9%
22.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. FEPI over 1 year: paid 22.1%, price −19.3%, total +2.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.1.3 pts behind SPY
OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
OMAH
+13.5%
14.7% of it arrived as cash
1.3 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.3 pts behind SPY
OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
OMAH
+13.5%
14.7% as cash
1.3 pts behind SPY
14.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
FEPI costs 0.33 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.6 points; OMAH is 1.6 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | FEPI | OMAH |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.9% | +13.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 19.3% | fell 2.4% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | not published | S&P 500, measured through SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.98% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $679m | $1.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 10% | |
Risk and return
Mar 14, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 85 weekly returnsFrom Mar 2025 to Oct 2026, FEPI returned more: +32.1% to +18.2%. OMAH swung less: 11.4% to 20.7%. OMAH fell less at its worst: −8.6% to −13.0%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | FEPI | OMAH | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +32.1% | +18.2% | FEPI | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +18.6% | +10.8% | FEPI | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −12.1% | −8.0% | OMAH | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 20.7% | 11.4% | OMAH | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 14.5% | 8.8% | OMAH | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −13.0% | −8.6% | OMAH | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.74 | 0.61 | FEPI | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.05 | 0.79 | FEPI | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 1.43 | 1.26 | FEPI | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 85 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FEPI and OMAH hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
10% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | FEPI | OMAH | FEPI | OMAH | FEPI | OMAH |
| 3 months | −1.5% | +2.5% | 6.4% | 3.7% | not measured | +2.6 pts |
| 6 months | −2.4% | +6.2% | 11.2% | 7.4% | not measured | +1.2 pts |
| 1 year | +2.9% | +13.5% | 22.1% | 14.7% | not measured | −1.3 pts |
| 3 years | +55.6% | – | 69.1% | – | not measured | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: FEPI Oct 2023 · OMAH Mar 2025 | +56.7% | +19.2% | 69.6% | 23.7% | not measured | −14.9 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FEPI
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FEPI paid 22.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.9%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.9%, paid weekly.
OMAH
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OMAH paid 14.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.0%, paid monthly. VistaShares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FEPI against OMAH, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fepi-vs-omah
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). FEPI against OMAH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fepi-vs-omah
[FEPI against OMAH (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fepi-vs-omah)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.