Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

OMAH vs YYY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year OMAH paid 14.4% of its price in cash against YYY’s 12.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.

VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF and Amplify CEF High Income ETF.

14.4%OMAH cash paid, 1 year
12.1%YYY cash paid, 1 year
+8.8%OMAH total return, 1 year
+3.4%YYY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OMAH scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

OMAH 65.2YYY 22.33.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

OMAH4.9 pts ahead of BRK-B · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
BRK-B+3.9%OMAH+8.8%14.4% of it arrived as cash4.9 pts ahead of BRK-BTotal return, distributions reinvestedBRK-B+3.9%OMAH+8.8%4.9 pts ahead of BRK-B
YYY13.2 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%YYY+3.4%12.1% as cash13.2 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%YYY+3.4%13.2 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and YYY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in OMAHOnly in YYY
Apple Inc 10.59%abrdn Healthcare Investors 3.64%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22%BlackRock Capital Allocation T 3.56%
American Express Co 6.57%Royce Small-Cap Trust Inc 3.55%
Coca-Cola Co/The 4.94%abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend F 3.53%
VeriSign Inc 4.90%Tortoise Energy Infrastructure 3.38%
Kroger Co/The 4.79%BlackRock ESG Capital Allocati 3.31%
Chevron Corp 4.75%DoubleLine Income Solutions Fu 3.22%
DAVITA INC 4.75%Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fu 3.08%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

OMAH and YYY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
OMAHYYYOMAHYYYOMAHYYY
3 months+1.7%−2.5%3.7%3.1%−2.4 pts−4.8 pts
6 months+8.8%+4.7%7.7%6.5%+2.8 pts−13.3 pts
1 year+8.8%+3.4%14.4%12.1%+4.9 pts−13.2 pts
3 yearsnot published+37.1%not published37.7%not published−41.3 pts
Since launch+14.6%+117.8%21.4%112.4%+12.4 pts−519.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
OMAH and YYY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
OMAH
VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF
Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly
YYY
Amplify CEF High Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerVistaSharesAmplify
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkBerkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxyS&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized15.1%13.3%
Expense ratio0.98%3.23%
Cash paid, 1 year14.4%12.1%
Price change, 1 year−6.3%−8.8%
Total return, 1 year+8.8%+3.4%
Benchmark return, 1 year+3.9%+16.6%
Ahead or behind+4.9 pts−13.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age562 days5211 days
Net assets$1.1bn$702m

OMAH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.

YYY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YYY paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, OMAH or YYY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting price in cash and YYY paid 12.1%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, OMAH or YYY?
With every distribution reinvested, OMAH returned +8.8% and YYY returned +3.4% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so OMAH returned more.
Which is cheaper, OMAH or YYY?
OMAH charges 0.98% a year and YYY charges 3.23%, so OMAH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

OMAH against YYY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against YYY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-yyy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources