Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
KYLD vs OMAH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, KYLD paid 25.2% of its price in cash against OMAH’s 14.7%, though OMAH returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about KYLD and OMAH
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $47m for Kurv High Income ETF and $1.1bn for VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF.
Not measured
KYLD over 1 year: paid 25.2%, price −28.6%, total −5.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
KYLD
−5.0%
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
KYLD over 1 year: paid 25.2%, price −28.6%, total −5.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
KYLD
−5.0%
25.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. KYLD over 1 year: paid 25.2%, price −28.6%, total −5.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.1.3 pts behind SPY
OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
OMAH
+13.5%
14.7% of it arrived as cash
1.3 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.3 pts behind SPY
OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
OMAH
+13.5%
14.7% as cash
1.3 pts behind SPY
14.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
OMAH costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 18.5 points; OMAH is far larger, $1.1bn against $47m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | KYLD | OMAH |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −5.0% | +13.5% |
| Price change | fell 21.4% (6 months) | fell 2.4% (1 year) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Oct 29, 2026 payment | 100% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | its own holdings | S&P 500, measured through SPY |
| Against its benchmark, same days | ahead by 7.7 pts | behind by 1.3 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 1.08% | 0.98% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $47m | $1.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Risk and return
Nov 7, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 51 weekly returnsFrom Nov 2025 to Oct 2026, OMAH returned more: +10.0% to −4.7%. OMAH fell less at its worst: −4.5% to −17.7%.
Full scorecard
3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | KYLD | OMAH | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | −4.7% | +10.0% | OMAH | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Price return | −28.0% | −5.4% | OMAH | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Max drawdown | −17.7% | −4.5% | OMAH | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 51 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, KYLD and OMAH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | KYLD | OMAH | KYLD | OMAH | KYLD | OMAH |
| 3 months | −13.3% | +2.5% | 6.2% | 3.7% | +4.1 pts | +2.6 pts |
| 6 months | −10.9% | +6.2% | 11.9% | 7.4% | +7.6 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 1 year | −5.0% | +13.5% | 25.2% | 14.7% | not measured | −1.3 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: KYLD Oct 2025 · OMAH Mar 2025 | −10.9% | +19.2% | 23.6% | 23.7% | not measured | −14.9 pts |
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
No 1-year comparison: it had filed no holdings by Nov 4, 2025, the year's first day. KYLD's own holdings, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Aug 31, 2026) returned −18.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 7.7 pts.
Over the 6 months to Nov 4, 2026, KYLD paid 11.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.9%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.4%, paid weekly. Kurv estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 29, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
OMAH
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OMAH paid 14.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.0%, paid monthly. VistaShares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, KYLD against OMAH, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kyld-vs-omah
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). KYLD against OMAH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kyld-vs-omah
[KYLD against OMAH (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kyld-vs-omah)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.