Data as of .
OMAH vs QVOL: which paid, and which earned it?
OMAH and QVOL both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and QVOL hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | OMAH | QVOL |
|---|---|---|
| Alphabet Inc | 4.57% | 4.70% |
| Alphabet Inc | 4.54% | 4.69% |
| Apple Inc | 10.59% | 2.33% |
| Only in OMAH | Only in QVOL |
|---|---|
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% | NVIDIA Corp 8.53% |
| American Express Co 6.57% | Amazon.com Inc 7.61% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The 4.94% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 6.17% |
| VeriSign Inc 4.90% | Microsoft Corp 5.05% |
| Kroger Co/The 4.79% | Micron Technology Inc 4.53% |
| Chevron Corp 4.75% | Marvell Technology Inc 4.30% |
| DAVITA INC 4.75% | Broadcom Inc 3.42% |
| Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.14% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMAH | QVOL | OMAH | QVOL | OMAH | QVOL | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | −3.7% | 3.7% | 3.0% | −2.4 pts | −1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +8.8% | not published | 7.7% | not published | +2.8 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +8.8% | not published | 14.4% | not published | +4.9 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +14.6% | +4.3% | 21.4% | 4.2% | +12.4 pts | +2.1 pts |
| OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | QVOL Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | Infrastructure Capital |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.1% | 12.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 0.82% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.4% | 4.2% (since launch on May 12, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −6.3% | 0.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.8% | +4.3% (since launch on May 12, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +3.9% | +2.1% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.9 pts | +2.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 562 days | 129 days |
| Net assets | $1.1bn | $8m |
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
QVOL in plain words
Over the period since launch on May 12, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, QVOL paid 4.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +2.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.6%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, OMAH or QVOL?
- OMAH charges 0.98% a year and QVOL charges 0.82%, so QVOL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against QVOL, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-qvol Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.