Data as of .
PBP vs QVOL: which paid, and which earned it?
PBP and QVOL both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PBP and QVOL hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | PBP | QVOL |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 8.18% | 8.53% |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.57% | 5.05% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 3.77% | 7.61% |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.11% | 4.70% |
| Broadcom Inc | 2.57% | 3.42% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.47% | 4.69% |
| Apple Inc | 7.50% | 2.33% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 2.22% | 3.14% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 1.74% | 4.53% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.39% | 6.17% |
| Intel Corp | 0.81% | 3.01% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 0.66% | 1.36% |
| Only in PBP | Only in QVOL |
|---|---|
| Tesla Inc 1.56% | ASML Holding NV 2.25% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.42% | PDD Holdings Inc 0.94% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.42% | GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc 0.59% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 1.38% | MercadoLibre Inc 0.52% |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 1.03% | Atlassian Corp 0.33% |
| Johnson & Johnson 0.99% | ARM Holdings PLC 0.25% |
| Visa Inc 0.93% | Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc 0.18% |
| Walmart Inc 0.71% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 19, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBP | QVOL | PBP | QVOL | PBP | QVOL | |
| 3 months | +5.0% | −3.7% | 2.8% | 3.0% | +2.7 pts | −1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +13.0% | not published | 5.7% | not published | −5.0 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +18.5% | not published | 11.8% | not published | +1.9 pts | not published |
| 3 years | +46.1% | not published | 31.8% | not published | −32.3 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +199.0% | +4.3% | 101.2% | 4.2% | −604.5 pts | +2.1 pts |
| PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | QVOL Infrastructure Capital Nasdaq Option Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Invesco | Infrastructure Capital |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 11.3% | 12.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.82% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.8% | 4.2% (since launch on May 12, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | +5.5% | 0.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.5% | +4.3% (since launch on May 12, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +2.1% |
| Ahead or behind | +1.9 pts | +2.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 6101 days | 129 days |
| Net assets | $386m | $8m |
PBP in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, PBP paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.3%, paid monthly.
QVOL in plain words
Over the period since launch on May 12, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, QVOL paid 4.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +2.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.6%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, PBP or QVOL?
- PBP charges 0.29% a year and QVOL charges 0.82%, so PBP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, PBP against QVOL, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/pbp-vs-qvol Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.