Data as of .
OMAH vs YSPC: which paid, and which earned it?
OMAH and YSPC both write options for income.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMAH | YSPC | OMAH | YSPC | OMAH | YSPC | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | not published | 3.7% | not published | −2.4 pts | not published |
| 6 months | +8.8% | not published | 7.7% | not published | +2.8 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +8.8% | not published | 14.4% | not published | +4.9 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +14.6% | +6.4% | 21.4% | 10.9% | +12.4 pts | +5.3 pts |
| OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | YSPC YieldMax(R) [SpaceX] Option Income Strategy ETF Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.1% | 63.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 1.01% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.4% | 10.9% (since launch on Jul 15, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −6.3% | −5.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.8% | +6.4% (since launch on Jul 15, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +3.9% | +1.2% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.9 pts | +5.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 0% |
| Age | 562 days | 65 days |
| Net assets | $1.1bn | $32m |
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
YSPC in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jul 15, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, YSPC paid 10.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +1.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 63.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, OMAH or YSPC?
- OMAH charges 0.98% a year and YSPC charges 1.01%, so OMAH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against YSPC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-yspc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.