Data as of .
DDDD vs OMAH: which paid, and which earned it?
DDDD and OMAH both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DDDD and OMAH hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DDDD | OMAH |
|---|---|---|
| Chevron Corp | 4.10% | 4.75% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The | 4.02% | 4.94% |
| Only in DDDD | Only in OMAH |
|---|---|
| Texas Instruments Inc 5.66% | Apple Inc 10.59% |
| UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.04% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% |
| QUALCOMM Inc 4.85% | American Express Co 6.57% |
| ConocoPhillips 3.91% | VeriSign Inc 4.90% |
| PepsiCo Inc 3.85% | Kroger Co/The 4.79% |
| Procter & Gamble Co/The 3.67% | DAVITA INC 4.75% |
| Amgen Inc 3.64% | Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% |
| Verizon Communications Inc 3.64% | Alphabet Inc 4.57% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDDD | OMAH | DDDD | OMAH | DDDD | OMAH | |
| 3 months | +4.9% | +1.7% | 1.6% | 3.7% | +2.6 pts | −2.4 pts |
| 6 months | +10.5% | +8.8% | 1.7% | 7.7% | −7.6 pts | +2.8 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +8.8% | not published | 14.4% | not published | +4.9 pts |
| Since launch | +8.7% | +14.6% | 1.6% | 21.4% | −6.5 pts | +12.4 pts |
| DDDD YieldMax(R) U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF Synthetic covered call on SPY | OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | VistaShares |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy |
| Pays | not established | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 18.4% | 15.1% |
| Expense ratio | 1.01% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 1.6% (since launch on Mar 12, 2026) | 14.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +7.0% | −6.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.7% (since launch on Mar 12, 2026) | +8.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +15.3% | +3.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −6.5 pts | +4.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 67% | not published |
| Age | 190 days | 562 days |
| Net assets | $7m | $1.1bn |
DDDD in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 12, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, DDDD paid 1.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.4%, paid periodically. YieldMax estimates that 67% of the distribution paid Jul 6, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, DDDD or OMAH?
- DDDD charges 1.01% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so OMAH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DDDD against OMAH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dddd-vs-omah Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.