Data as of .
FDND vs OMAH: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OMAH paid 14.4% of its price in cash against FDND’s 7.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OMAH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDND and OMAH hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FDND | OMAH |
|---|---|---|
| Alphabet Inc. (Class A) | 5.82% | 4.57% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class C) | 4.65% | 4.54% |
| VeriSign, Inc. | 0.84% | 4.90% |
| Only in FDND | Only in OMAH |
|---|---|
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 10.12% | Apple Inc 10.59% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 9.98% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. 8.66% | American Express Co 6.57% |
| Netflix, Inc. 5.90% | Coca-Cola Co/The 4.94% |
| Arista Networks, Inc. 4.62% | Kroger Co/The 4.79% |
| Salesforce, Inc. 4.36% | Chevron Corp 4.75% |
| Booking Holdings Inc. 4.28% | DAVITA INC 4.75% |
| Oracle Corporation 4.08% | Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDND | OMAH | FDND | OMAH | FDND | OMAH | |
| 3 months | +8.9% | +1.7% | 2.0% | 3.7% | +8.5 pts | −2.4 pts |
| 6 months | +18.8% | +8.8% | 4.3% | 7.7% | +4.8 pts | +2.8 pts |
| 1 year | −0.6% | +8.8% | 7.1% | 14.4% | −14.1 pts | +4.9 pts |
| Since launch | +34.3% | +14.6% | 20.4% | 21.4% | −0.5 pts | +12.4 pts |
| FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF Option income on DIA, paying monthly | OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | VistaShares |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 7.8% | 15.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 7.1% | 14.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | −8.2% | −6.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.6% | +8.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +13.5% | +3.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −14.1 pts | +4.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 911 days | 562 days |
| Net assets | $10m | $1.1bn |
FDND in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FDND paid 7.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.6%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.8%, paid monthly.
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, FDND or OMAH?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FDND paid 7.1% of its starting price in cash and OMAH paid 14.4%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, FDND or OMAH?
- With every distribution reinvested, FDND returned −0.6% and OMAH returned +8.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so OMAH returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FDND or OMAH?
- FDND charges 0.75% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so FDND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDND against OMAH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fdnd-vs-omah Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.