Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

LAPR vs OMAH: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year OMAH paid 14.4% of its price in cash against LAPR’s 5.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April and VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF.

5.9%LAPR cash paid, 1 year
14.4%OMAH cash paid, 1 year
+6.1%LAPR total return, 1 year
+8.8%OMAH total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OMAH scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

LAPR 42.6OMAH 65.23.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

LAPR10.5 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%LAPR+6.1%5.9% of it arrived as cash10.5 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%LAPR+6.1%10.5 pts behind SPY
OMAH4.9 pts ahead of BRK-B · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
BRK-B+3.9%OMAH+8.8%14.4% of it arrived as cash4.9 pts ahead of BRK-BTotal return, distributions reinvestedBRK-B+3.9%OMAH+8.8%4.9 pts ahead of BRK-B

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LAPR and OMAH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in LAPROnly in OMAH
TREASURY BILL 94.62%Apple Inc 10.59%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%American Express Co 6.57%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%Coca-Cola Co/The 4.94%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%VeriSign Inc 4.90%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%Kroger Co/The 4.79%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%Chevron Corp 4.75%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%DAVITA INC 4.75%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

LAPR and OMAH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
LAPROMAHLAPROMAHLAPROMAH
3 months+1.3%+1.7%1.7%3.7%−0.9 pts−2.4 pts
6 months+3.8%+8.8%3.3%7.7%−14.2 pts+2.8 pts
1 year+6.1%+8.8%5.9%14.4%−10.5 pts+4.9 pts
Since launch+16.1%+14.6%13.8%21.4%−34.1 pts+12.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
LAPR and OMAH on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
LAPR
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April
Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly
OMAH
VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF
Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly
IssuerInnovatorVistaShares
Strategybuffer with incomecovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized6.7%15.1%
Expense ratio0.79%0.98%
Cash paid, 1 year5.9%14.4%
Price change, 1 year0.0%−6.3%
Total return, 1 year+6.1%+8.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+3.9%
Ahead or behind−10.5 pts+4.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age900 days562 days
Net assets$11m$1.1bn

LAPR in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LAPR paid 5.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly.

OMAH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, LAPR or OMAH?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LAPR paid 5.9% of its starting price in cash and OMAH paid 14.4%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, LAPR or OMAH?
With every distribution reinvested, LAPR returned +6.1% and OMAH returned +8.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so OMAH returned more.
Which is cheaper, LAPR or OMAH?
LAPR charges 0.79% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so LAPR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LAPR against OMAH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LAPR against OMAH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/lapr-vs-omah Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources