Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

MPIM vs XQQI: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+3.6 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: XQQI ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.28 pts
A year: MPIM 0.70%, XQQI 0.98%, per filings dated Jan 28, 2026 and Aug 7, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

MPIM costs 0.28 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

MPIM vs XQQI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureMPIMXQQI
Paid and earned
Price changefell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026)fell 9.9% (since Feb 3, 2026)
Against its benchmark
Benchmarknot publishedNasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.70%0.98%
Net assetsnot read by ETFIQ$431m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
3.0%
MPIM cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
17.0%
XQQI cash paid, since launch, Feb 3, 2026
−10.0%
MPIM total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
+6.9%
XQQI total return, since launch, Feb 3, 2026
MPIM · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
MPIM
−10.0%
none

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

3.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
XQQI · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 5.1 pts behind QQQ
XQQI
+6.9%
QQQ
+12.0%

5.1 pts behind QQQ

XQQI since launch: paid 17.0%, price −9.9%, total +6.9%, QQQ +12.0%, −5.1 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

+12.0%

XQQI

+6.9%

17.0% of it arrived as cash

5.1 pts behind QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

5.1 pts behind QQQ

XQQI since launch: paid 17.0%, price −9.9%, total +6.9%, QQQ +12.0%, −5.1 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

+12.0%

XQQI

+6.9%

5.1 pts behind QQQ

17.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. XQQI since launch: paid 17.0%, price −9.9%, total +6.9%, QQQ +12.0%, −5.1 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

MPIM m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Autocallable XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF · Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
Issuer m+ NEOS
Strategy autocallable option income
Benchmark not set Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 17.0% 20.4%
Expense ratio 0.70% 0.98%
Cash paid, 1 year 3.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) 17.0% (since launch, Feb 3, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −12.8% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) −9.9% (since launch, Feb 3, 2026)
Total return, 1 year −10.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) +6.9% (since launch, Feb 3, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year not published +12.0% (since launch, Feb 3, 2026)
Ahead or behind not available −5.1 pts (since launch, Feb 3, 2026)
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 100%
Age 92 days 282 days
Net assets not read by ETFIQ $431m

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: MPIM vs XQQI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowMPIMXQQIMPIMXQQIMPIMXQQI
3 months−10.6%−7.0%3.0%4.9%not measured−1.1 pts
6 months–−6.7%–9.7%–−2.5 pts
Since launchNot the same days: MPIM Aug 2026 · XQQI Feb 2026−10.0%+6.9%3.0%17.0%not measured−5.1 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

XQQI flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MPIM

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.

XQQI

Over the period from its first trade on Feb 3, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, XQQI paid 17.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 9.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.9%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.1 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.4%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 6, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, MPIM or XQQI?
MPIM charges 0.70% a year and XQQI charges 0.98%, so MPIM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MPIM against XQQI, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mpim-vs-xqqi

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

MPIM and XQQI both write options for income.

Growth of 100

MPIM and XQQI

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

MPIM −10.6%XQQI −7.0%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

MPIM −10.6%, XQQI −7.0%: XQQI +3.6 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.