Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

ACQQ vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+6.4 pts
1 month to Nov 12, 2026: MPIM ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.02 pts
A year: ACQQ 0.72%, MPIM 0.70%, per filings dated Jul 23, 2026 and Aug 7, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

MPIM costs 0.02 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ACQQ vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureACQQMPIM
Paid and earned
Price changefell 17.9% (since Aug 14, 2026)fell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026)
Return of capital, issuer estimate88% of the Nov 6, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkNasdaq-100, measured through QQQnot published
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.72%0.70%
Net assets$38mnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
3.3%
ACQQ cash paid, since launch, Aug 14, 2026
3.0%
MPIM cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
−15.0%
ACQQ total return, since launch, Aug 14, 2026
−10.0%
MPIM total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
ACQQ · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 9.2 pts behind QQQ
ACQQ
−15.0%
QQQ
−5.8%

9.2 pts behind QQQ

ACQQ since launch: paid 3.3%, price −17.9%, total −15.0%, QQQ −5.8%, −9.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

−5.8%

ACQQ

−15.0%

9.2 pts behind QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.2 pts behind QQQ

ACQQ since launch: paid 3.3%, price −17.9%, total −15.0%, QQQ −5.8%, −9.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

−5.8%

ACQQ

−15.0%

9.2 pts behind QQQ

3.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACQQ since launch: paid 3.3%, price −17.9%, total −15.0%, QQQ −5.8%, −9.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MPIM · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
MPIM
−10.0%
none

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

3.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

ACQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on QQQ MPIM m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Autocallable
Issuer ProShares m+
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) not set
Pays not established not established
Payout rate, annualized 18.8% 17.0%
Expense ratio 0.72% 0.70%
Cash paid, 1 year 3.3% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) 3.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −17.9% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) −12.8% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Total return, 1 year −15.0% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) −10.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year −5.8% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) not published
Ahead or behind −9.2 pts (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) not available
Return of capital, latest estimate 88% not published
Age 90 days 92 days
Net assets $38m not read by ETFIQ

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: ACQQ vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACQQMPIMACQQMPIMACQQMPIM
3 months–−10.6%–3.0%–not measured
Since launchNot the same days: ACQQ Aug 2026 · MPIM Aug 2026−15.0%−10.0%3.3%3.0%−9.2 ptsnot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

ACQQ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ACQQ

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 14, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, ACQQ paid 3.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 17.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −15.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned −5.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.2 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.8%, paid periodically. ProShares estimates that 88% of the distribution paid Nov 6, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

MPIM

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACQQ or MPIM?
ACQQ charges 0.72% a year and MPIM charges 0.70%, so MPIM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACQQ against MPIM, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-mpim

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

ACQQ and MPIM both write options for income.

Growth of 100

ACQQ and MPIM

Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 month.

ACQQ −15.8%MPIM −9.4%
Oct 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

ACQQ −15.8%, MPIM −9.4%: MPIM +6.4 pts ahead, 1 month, Oct 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.