Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

MPIM vs QDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+5.2 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: QDTY ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.47 pts
A year: MPIM 0.70%, QDTY 1.17%, per filings dated Nov 21, 2025 and Aug 7, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

MPIM costs 0.47 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

MPIM vs QDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureMPIMQDTY
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 yearnot published+8.4%
Price changefell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026)fell 22.5% (1 year)
Against its benchmark
Benchmarknot publishedNasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.70%1.17%
Net assetsnot read by ETFIQ$37m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
3.0%
MPIM cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
30.0%
QDTY cash paid, 1 year
−10.0%
MPIM total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
+8.4%
QDTY total return, 1 year
MPIM · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
MPIM
−10.0%
none

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

3.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
QDTY · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 2.9 pts behind QQQ
QDTY
+8.4%
QQQ
+11.3%

2.9 pts behind QQQ

QDTY over 1 year: paid 30.0%, price −22.5%, total +8.4%, QQQ +11.3%, −2.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

+11.3%

QDTY

+8.4%

30.0% of it arrived as cash

2.9 pts behind QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.9 pts behind QQQ

QDTY over 1 year: paid 30.0%, price −22.5%, total +8.4%, QQQ +11.3%, −2.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

+11.3%

QDTY

+8.4%

2.9 pts behind QQQ

30.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QDTY over 1 year: paid 30.0%, price −22.5%, total +8.4%, QQQ +11.3%, −2.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

MPIM m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Autocallable QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF · 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
Issuer m+ YieldMax
Strategy autocallable 0DTE covered call
Benchmark not set Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays not established weekly
Payout rate, annualized 17.0% 31.4%
Expense ratio 0.70% 1.17%
Cash paid, 1 year 3.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) 30.0%
Price change, 1 year −12.8% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) −22.5%
Total return, 1 year −10.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) +8.4%
Benchmark return, 1 year not published +11.3%
Ahead or behind not available −2.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published
Age 92 days 1.7 years
Net assets not read by ETFIQ $37m

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: MPIM vs QDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowMPIMQDTYMPIMQDTYMPIMQDTY
3 months−10.6%−5.4%3.0%7.0%not measured+0.5 pts
6 months–−2.8%–14.8%–+1.4 pts
1 year–+8.4%–30.0%–−2.9 pts
Since launchNot the same days: MPIM Aug 2026 · QDTY Feb 2025−10.0%+20.7%3.0%45.5%not measured−8.8 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

QDTY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MPIM

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.

QDTY

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, QDTY paid 30.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 22.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +11.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 31.4%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, MPIM or QDTY?
MPIM charges 0.70% a year and QDTY charges 1.17%, so MPIM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MPIM against QDTY, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mpim-vs-qdty

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

MPIM and QDTY both write options for income.

Growth of 100

MPIM and QDTY

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

MPIM −10.6%QDTY −5.4%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

MPIM −10.6%, QDTY −5.4%: QDTY +5.2 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.