Data as of .
QDTY vs RECI: which paid, and which earned it?
QDTY and RECI both write options for income.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDTY | RECI | QDTY | RECI | QDTY | RECI | |
| 3 months | −0.9% | not published | 7.9% | not published | +1.6 pts | not published |
| 6 months | +20.7% | not published | 17.3% | not published | −3.6 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +20.2% | not published | 30.9% | not published | −1.6 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +27.1% | +2.4% | 42.0% | 0.7% | −8.5 pts | +0.8 pts |
| QDTY YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | RECI Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | Columbia |
| Strategy | 0DTE covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | weekly | not established |
| Payout rate, annualized | 25.9% | 8.0% |
| Expense ratio | 1.17% | 0.30% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 30.9% | 0.7% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −14.0% | +1.7% |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.2% | +2.4% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +1.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −1.6 pts | +0.8 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 94% | not published |
| Age | 582 days | 66 days |
| Net assets | $27m | not published |
QDTY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTY paid 30.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
RECI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jul 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, RECI paid 0.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +1.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.0%, paid periodically.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, QDTY or RECI?
- QDTY charges 1.17% a year and RECI charges 0.30%, so RECI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTY against RECI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdty-vs-reci Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.