Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

MPIM vs QLDY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+3.9 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: QLDY ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.34 pts
A year: MPIM 0.70%, QLDY 1.04%, per filings dated May 23, 2025 and Aug 7, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

MPIM costs 0.34 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

MPIM vs QLDY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureMPIMQLDY
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 yearnot published+8.2%
Price changefell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026)fell 27.5% (1 year)
Return of capital, issuer estimate1% of the Nov 5, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Benchmarknot publishedNasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.70%1.04%
Net assetsnot read by ETFIQ$54m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
3.0%
MPIM cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
35.0%
QLDY cash paid, 1 year
−10.0%
MPIM total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
+8.2%
QLDY total return, 1 year
MPIM · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
MPIM
−10.0%
none

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

3.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
QLDY · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 3.1 pts behind QQQ
QLDY
+8.2%
QQQ
+11.3%

3.1 pts behind QQQ

QLDY over 1 year: paid 35.0%, price −27.5%, total +8.2%, QQQ +11.3%, −3.1 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

+11.3%

QLDY

+8.2%

35.0% of it arrived as cash

3.1 pts behind QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.1 pts behind QQQ

QLDY over 1 year: paid 35.0%, price −27.5%, total +8.2%, QQQ +11.3%, −3.1 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

+11.3%

QLDY

+8.2%

3.1 pts behind QQQ

35.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QLDY over 1 year: paid 35.0%, price −27.5%, total +8.2%, QQQ +11.3%, −3.1 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

MPIM m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Autocallable QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF · Option income on QQQ, paying weekly
Issuer m+ Defiance
Strategy autocallable option income
Benchmark not set Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays not established weekly
Payout rate, annualized 17.0% 19.8%
Expense ratio 0.70% 1.04%
Cash paid, 1 year 3.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) 35.0%
Price change, 1 year −12.8% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) −27.5%
Total return, 1 year −10.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) +8.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year not published +11.3%
Ahead or behind not available −3.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 1%
Age 92 days 1.1 years
Net assets not read by ETFIQ $54m

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: MPIM vs QLDY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowMPIMQLDYMPIMQLDYMPIMQLDY
3 months−10.6%−6.7%3.0%9.3%not measured−0.8 pts
6 months–−7.2%–17.8%–−3.1 pts
1 year–+8.2%–35.0%–−3.1 pts
Since launchNot the same days: MPIM Aug 2026 · QLDY Sep 2025−10.0%+12.6%3.0%39.6%not measured−3.6 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

QLDY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MPIM

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.

QLDY

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, QLDY paid 35.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 27.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +11.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.1 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.8%, paid weekly. Defiance estimates that 1% of the distribution paid Nov 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, MPIM or QLDY?
MPIM charges 0.70% a year and QLDY charges 1.04%, so MPIM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MPIM against QLDY, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mpim-vs-qldy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

MPIM and QLDY both write options for income.

Growth of 100

MPIM and QLDY

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

MPIM −10.6%QLDY −6.7%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

MPIM −10.6%, QLDY −6.7%: QLDY +3.9 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.