Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

CAIQ vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+6.2 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: CAIQ ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.04 pts
A year: CAIQ 0.74%, MPIM 0.70%, per filings dated Apr 15, 2026 and Aug 7, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

MPIM costs 0.04 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

CAIQ vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureCAIQMPIM
Paid and earned
Price changefell 4.3% (since Nov 20, 2025)fell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026)
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Nov 9, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkNasdaq-100, measured through QQQnot published
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.74%0.70%
Net assets$286mnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
16.8%
CAIQ cash paid, since launch, Nov 20, 2025
3.0%
MPIM cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
+12.7%
CAIQ total return, since launch, Nov 20, 2025
−10.0%
MPIM total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
CAIQ · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 5.3 pts behind QQQ
CAIQ
+12.7%
QQQ
+18.0%

5.3 pts behind QQQ

CAIQ since launch: paid 16.8%, price −4.3%, total +12.7%, QQQ +18.0%, −5.3 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

+18.0%

CAIQ

+12.7%

16.8% of it arrived as cash

5.3 pts behind QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

5.3 pts behind QQQ

CAIQ since launch: paid 16.8%, price −4.3%, total +12.7%, QQQ +18.0%, −5.3 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

+18.0%

CAIQ

+12.7%

5.3 pts behind QQQ

16.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. CAIQ since launch: paid 16.8%, price −4.3%, total +12.7%, QQQ +18.0%, −5.3 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MPIM · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
MPIM
−10.0%
none

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

3.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on QQQ, paying monthly MPIM m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Autocallable
Issuer Calamos m+
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) not set
Pays monthly not established
Payout rate, annualized 19.6% 17.0%
Expense ratio 0.74% 0.70%
Cash paid, 1 year 16.8% (since launch, Nov 20, 2025) 3.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −4.3% (since launch, Nov 20, 2025) −12.8% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Total return, 1 year +12.7% (since launch, Nov 20, 2025) −10.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +18.0% (since launch, Nov 20, 2025) not published
Ahead or behind −5.3 pts (since launch, Nov 20, 2025) not available
Return of capital, latest estimate 100% not published
Age 357 days 92 days
Net assets $286m not read by ETFIQ

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: CAIQ vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowCAIQMPIMCAIQMPIMCAIQMPIM
3 months−4.4%−10.6%4.4%3.0%+1.5 ptsnot measured
6 months−3.5%–8.5%–+0.7 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: CAIQ Nov 2025 · MPIM Aug 2026+12.7%−10.0%16.8%3.0%−5.3 ptsnot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CAIQ

Over the period from its first trade on Nov 20, 2025 to Nov 12, 2026, CAIQ paid 16.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 4.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +18.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.3 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.6%, paid monthly. Calamos estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 9, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

MPIM

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, CAIQ or MPIM?
CAIQ charges 0.74% a year and MPIM charges 0.70%, so MPIM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CAIQ against MPIM, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-mpim

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

CAIQ and MPIM both write options for income.

Growth of 100

CAIQ and MPIM

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

CAIQ −4.4%MPIM −10.6%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

CAIQ −4.4%, MPIM −10.6%: CAIQ +6.2 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.