Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

OARK vs XQQI: which paid, and which earned it?

OARK and XQQI both write options for income.

YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF.

37.4%OARK cash paid, 1 year
13.7%XQQI cash paid, 1 year
+6.6%OARK total return, 1 year
+14.3%XQQI total return, 1 year
OARK15.2 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%OARK+6.6%37.4% as cash15.2 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%OARK+6.6%15.2 pts behind QQQ
XQQI2.9 pts behind QQQ · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+17.3%XQQI+14.3%13.7% of it arrived as cash2.9 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+17.3%XQQI+14.3%13.7% cash2.9 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, OARK and XQQI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in OARKOnly in XQQI
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 31.97%NVIDIA Corp 8.70%
United States Treasury Bill 02/18/2027 31.91%Apple Inc 7.91%
United States Treasury Bill 07/08/2027 22.43%Microsoft Corp 5.94%
2ARKK US 11/20/26 C85.01 FLX 8.43%Micron Technology Inc 5.12%
United States Treasury Bill 12/10/2026 6.55%Amazon.com Inc 4.39%
United States Treasury Bill 10/15/2026 3.23%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.08%
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 1.09%Alphabet Inc 3.28%
ARKK US 09/25/26 C86 0.66%Meta Platforms Inc 3.27%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

OARK and XQQI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
OARKXQQIOARKXQQIOARKXQQI
3 months+3.9%−2.7%9.0%4.8%+6.4 pts−0.2 pts
6 months+20.0%+21.8%22.6%11.4%−4.2 pts−2.4 pts
1 year+6.6%not published37.4%not published−15.2 ptsnot published
3 years+61.9%not published87.5%not published−36.3 ptsnot published
Since launch+58.8%+14.3%89.4%13.7%−96.7 pts−2.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
OARK and XQQI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
OARK
YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
XQQI
NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerYieldMaxNEOS
Strategysynthetic covered calloption income
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxyNasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized27.9%20.5%
Expense ratio1.00%0.98%
Cash paid, 1 year37.4%13.7% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−34.0%−0.3%
Total return, 1 year+6.6%+14.3% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+17.3%
Ahead or behind−15.2 pts−2.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate0%100%
Age1395 days227 days
Net assets$32m$351m

OARK in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OARK paid 37.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 34.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 15.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 27.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

XQQI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XQQI paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +17.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.5%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, OARK or XQQI?
OARK charges 1.00% a year and XQQI charges 0.98%, so XQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

OARK against XQQI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, OARK against XQQI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/oark-vs-xqqi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources