Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GPIQ vs OARK: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year OARK paid 38.6% of its price in cash against GPIQ’s 11.1%, though GPIQ returned more with it reinvested.

Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF and YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

11.1%GPIQ cash paid, 1 year
38.6%OARK cash paid, 1 year
+21.9%GPIQ total return, 1 year
+7.2%OARK total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: GPIQ scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

GPIQ 78.5OARK 11.23.2, the lowest in this set96.9, the highest

A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

GPIQ1.1 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
QQQ+23.0%GPIQ+21.9%11.1% of it arrived as cash1.1 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.0%GPIQ+21.9%1.1 pts behind QQQ
OARK15.8 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
QQQ+23.0%OARK+7.2%38.6% of it arrived as cash15.8 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.0%OARK+7.2%15.8 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GPIQ and OARK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GPIQOnly in OARK
NVIDIA CORP 7.48%TREASURY BILL 37.81%
APPLE INC 6.59%TREASURY BILL 30.32%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.62%TREASURY BILL 18.55%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.20%TREASURY BILL 10.80%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 4.11%TREASURY BILL 2.51%
MICROSOFT CORP 3.96%
ALPHABET INC 3.54%
TESLA INC 3.17%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

GPIQ and OARK over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
GPIQOARKGPIQOARKGPIQOARK
3 months−0.4%+5.1%2.6%9.6%+0.4 pts+5.9 pts
6 months+17.3%+15.3%5.8%22.6%−3.4 pts−5.4 pts
1 year+21.9%+7.2%11.1%38.6%−1.1 pts−15.8 pts
3 yearsnot published+48.6%not published82.9%not published−46.5 pts
Since launch+96.4%+53.5%38.2%89.2%−15.0 pts−99.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GPIQ and OARK on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
OARK
YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
IssuerGoldman SachsYieldMax
Strategycovered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized10.6%37.1%
Expense ratio0.29%1.00%
Cash paid, 1 year11.1%38.6%
Price change, 1 year+9.8%−33.3%
Total return, 1 year+21.9%+7.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+23.0%+23.0%
Ahead or behind−1.1 pts−15.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published39%
Age1051 days1388 days

GPIQ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.9%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.1 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.6%, paid monthly.

OARK in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, OARK paid 38.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 33.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 15.8 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 37.1%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 39% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, GPIQ or OARK?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.1% of its starting price in cash and OARK paid 38.6%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIQ or OARK?
With every distribution reinvested, GPIQ returned +21.9% and OARK returned +7.2% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so GPIQ returned more.
Which is cheaper, GPIQ or OARK?
GPIQ charges 0.29% a year and OARK charges 1.00%, so GPIQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GPIQ against OARK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIQ against OARK, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpiq-vs-oark Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources