Data as of .
OARK vs QYLD: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OARK paid 38.6% of its price in cash against QYLD’s 12.5%, though QYLD returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QYLD scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OARK and QYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in OARK | Only in QYLD |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 37.81% | NVIDIA CORP 8.46% |
| TREASURY BILL 30.32% | APPLE INC 7.81% |
| TREASURY BILL 18.55% | MICROSOFT CORP 5.90% |
| TREASURY BILL 10.80% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.86% |
| TREASURY BILL 2.51% | AMAZON.COM INC 4.42% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 3.72% | |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.16% | |
| META PLATFORMS INC 3.07% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OARK | QYLD | OARK | QYLD | OARK | QYLD | |
| 3 months | +5.1% | +4.7% | 9.6% | 3.0% | +5.9 pts | +5.5 pts |
| 6 months | +15.3% | +11.8% | 22.6% | 6.2% | −5.4 pts | −8.9 pts |
| 1 year | +7.2% | +22.2% | 38.6% | 12.5% | −15.8 pts | −0.7 pts |
| 3 years | +48.6% | +51.3% | 82.9% | 36.6% | −46.5 pts | −43.8 pts |
| Since launch | +53.5% | +195.4% | 89.2% | 116.0% | −99.6 pts | −639.0 pts |
| OARK YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF Synthetic covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | Global X |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 37.1% | 11.9% |
| Expense ratio | 1.00% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 38.6% | 12.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | −33.3% | +8.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | +22.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +23.0% | +23.0% |
| Ahead or behind | −15.8 pts | −0.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 39% | 100% |
| Age | 1388 days | 4656 days |
OARK in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, OARK paid 38.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 33.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 15.8 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 37.1%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 39% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
QYLD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QYLD paid 12.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.9%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, OARK or QYLD?
- Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, OARK paid 38.6% of its starting price in cash and QYLD paid 12.5%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, OARK or QYLD?
- With every distribution reinvested, OARK returned +7.2% and QYLD returned +22.2% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so QYLD returned more.
- Which is cheaper, OARK or QYLD?
- OARK charges 1.00% a year and QYLD charges 0.60%, so QYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OARK against QYLD, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/oark-vs-qyld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.