Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QYLD vs XSHP: which paid, and which earned it?

QYLD and XSHP both write options for income.

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF and Kurv SpaceX (SPAX) Enhanced Income ETF.

12.5%QYLD cash paid, 1 year
7.3%XSHP cash paid, 1 year
+23.0%QYLD total return, 1 year
−13.1%XSHP total return, 1 year
QYLD1.2 pts ahead of QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QYLD+23.0%12.5% of it arrived as cash1.2 pts ahead of QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QYLD+23.0%1.2 pts ahead of QQQ
XSHP16.4 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+3.3%XSHP−13.1%16.4 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+3.3%XSHP−13.1%16.4 pts behind SPY

Performance, window by window

QYLD and XSHP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QYLDXSHPQYLDXSHPQYLDXSHP
3 months+3.2%−11.0%3.0%7.4%+5.7 pts−13.3 pts
6 months+14.5%not published6.3%not published−9.7 ptsnot published
1 year+23.0%not published12.5%not published+1.2 ptsnot published
3 years+55.3%not published36.6%not published−42.9 ptsnot published
Since launch+198.3%−13.1%116.0%7.3%−644.6 pts−16.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QYLD and XSHP on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
XSHP
Kurv SpaceX (SPAX) Enhanced Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerGlobal XKurv
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized11.8%33.5%
Expense ratio0.60%0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year12.5%7.3% (since launch on Jun 17, 2026)
Price change, 1 year+9.1%−21.8%
Total return, 1 year+23.0%−13.1% (since launch on Jun 17, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+3.3%
Ahead or behind+1.2 pts−16.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate100%94%
Age4663 days93 days
Net assets$8.5bn$7m

QYLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLD paid 12.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +23.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

XSHP in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jun 17, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XSHP paid 7.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −13.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +3.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 33.5%, paid monthly. Kurv estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, QYLD or XSHP?
QYLD charges 0.60% a year and XSHP charges 0.99%, so QYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QYLD against XSHP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QYLD against XSHP, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qyld-vs-xshp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources