Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MAGY vs YQQQ: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year MAGY paid 26.5% of its price in cash against YQQQ’s 23.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF and YieldMax(R) Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF.

26.5%MAGY cash paid, 1 year
23.1%YQQQ cash paid, 1 year
+1.8%MAGY total return, 1 year
−3.5%YQQQ total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: MAGY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

MAGY 22.6YQQQ 7.53.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

MAGY9.4 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGS
YQQQ25.3 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%YQQQ−3.5%25.3 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%YQQQ−3.5%25.3 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and YQQQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in MAGYOnly in YQQQ
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02%TREASURY BILL 27.63%
First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36%TREASURY BILL 25.80%
MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38%TREASURY BILL 19.43%
TREASURY BILL 15.20%
TREASURY BILL 11.95%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

MAGY and YQQQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
MAGYYQQQMAGYYQQQMAGYYQQQ
3 months+3.7%+5.8%6.1%6.5%−3.9 pts+8.3 pts
6 months+8.1%−13.9%12.9%10.8%−12.7 pts−38.2 pts
1 year+1.8%−3.5%26.5%23.1%−9.4 pts−25.3 pts
Since launch+25.6%−17.6%42.0%37.0%−37.5 pts−71.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MAGY and YQQQ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
YQQQ
YieldMax(R) Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
IssuerRoundhillYieldMax
Strategycovered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkMagnificent Seven (MAGS)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized19.2%21.3%
Expense ratio0.99%1.11%
Cash paid, 1 year26.5%23.1%
Price change, 1 year−25.3%−25.7%
Total return, 1 year+1.8%−3.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+11.2%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−9.4 pts−25.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published0%
Age513 days764 days
Net assets$102m$27m

MAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.

YQQQ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YQQQ paid 23.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 25.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 21.3%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, MAGY or YQQQ?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting price in cash and YQQQ paid 23.1%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, MAGY or YQQQ?
With every distribution reinvested, MAGY returned +1.8% and YQQQ returned −3.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so MAGY returned more.
Which is cheaper, MAGY or YQQQ?
MAGY charges 0.99% a year and YQQQ charges 1.11%, so MAGY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGY against YQQQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGY against YQQQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-yqqq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources