Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
MAGY vs XSHP: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MAGY and XSHP both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MAGY and XSHP
Net assets: $94m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF, and $11m on Nov 3, 2026 for Kurv SpaceX Enhanced Income ETF.
7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
Total return, distributions reinvested
7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
24.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Not measured
XSHP since launch: paid 11.3%, price −32.7%, total −21.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
XSHP
−21.1%
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
XSHP since launch: paid 11.3%, price −32.7%, total −21.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
XSHP
−21.1%
11.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. XSHP since launch: paid 11.3%, price −32.7%, total −21.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.99% a year; MAGY is 8.4 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | MAGY | XSHP |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.5% | not published |
| Price change | fell 26.1% (1 year) | fell 32.7% (since Jun 17, 2026) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment | 92% of the Oct 8, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Magnificent Seven, measured through MAGS | not published |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 0.99% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $92m | $11m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Risk and return
Jun 26, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026 · 18 weekly returnsFrom Jun 2026 to Oct 2026, MAGY returned more: +6.8% to −2.7%. MAGY fell less at its worst: −6.0% to −30.2%.
Full scorecard
3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | MAGY | XSHP | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +6.8% | −2.7% | MAGY | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Price return | −1.6% | −14.7% | MAGY | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Max drawdown | −6.0% | −30.2% | MAGY | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 18 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and XSHP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | MAGY | XSHP | MAGY | XSHP | MAGY | XSHP |
| 3 months | +4.0% | +31.3% | 5.4% | 11.2% | +1.2 pts | not measured |
| 6 months | +0.8% | – | 11.3% | – | −1.8 pts | – |
| 1 year | −1.5% | – | 24.0% | – | −7.8 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: MAGY Apr 2025 · XSHP Jun 2026 | +25.7% | −21.1% | 44.0% | 11.3% | −37.0 pts | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for XSHP.
MAGY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 26.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.1%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
XSHP
Over the period from its first trade on Jun 17, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, XSHP paid 11.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 32.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −21.1%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 33.7%, paid monthly. Kurv estimates that 92% of the distribution paid Oct 8, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MAGY against XSHP, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-xshp
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). MAGY against XSHP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-xshp
[MAGY against XSHP (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-xshp)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.