Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MAGY vs SIOO: which paid, and which earned it?

MAGY and SIOO both write options for income.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF and VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF.

26.5%MAGY cash paid, 1 year
11.1%SIOO cash paid, 1 year
+1.8%MAGY total return, 1 year
+10.8%SIOO total return, 1 year
MAGY9.4 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%26.5% as cash9.4 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGS
SIOOAbout even with OEF · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
OEF+11.0%SIOO+10.8%11.1% of it arrived as cashabout even with OEFTotal return, distributions reinvestedOEF+11.0%SIOO+10.8%11.1% as cashabout even with OEF

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and SIOO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in MAGYOnly in SIOO
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02%NVIDIA Corp 9.83%
First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36%Apple Inc 9.24%
MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38%United States Treasury Bill 12/10/2026 7.85%
Microsoft Corp 5.91%
Amazon.com Inc 4.41%
Alphabet Inc 3.62%
Broadcom Inc 3.57%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.12%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

MAGY and SIOO over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
MAGYSIOOMAGYSIOOMAGYSIOO
3 months+3.7%+4.0%6.1%3.7%−3.9 pts+0.7 pts
6 months+8.1%+14.3%12.9%7.9%−12.7 pts−5.8 pts
1 year+1.8%not published26.5%not published−9.4 ptsnot published
Since launch+25.6%+10.8%42.0%11.1%−37.5 pts−0.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MAGY and SIOO on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
SIOO
VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF
Covered call on OEF, paying monthly
IssuerRoundhillVistaShares
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkMagnificent Seven (MAGS)S&P 100 (OEF)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized19.2%15.1%
Expense ratio0.99%not published
Cash paid, 1 year26.5%11.1% (since launch on Dec 11, 2025)
Price change, 1 year−25.3%−1.1%
Total return, 1 year+1.8%+10.8% (since launch on Dec 11, 2025)
Benchmark return, 1 year+11.2%+11.0%
Ahead or behind−9.4 pts−0.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age513 days281 days
Net assets$102m$21m

MAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.

SIOO in plain words

Over the period since launch on Dec 11, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, SIOO paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.8%. S&P 100 (OEF) returned +11.0% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGY against SIOO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGY against SIOO, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-sioo Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources