Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MAGY vs XVSP: which paid, and which earned it?

MAGY and XVSP both write options for income.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF and FT Vest SPCX & Target Income ETF.

26.5%MAGY cash paid, 1 year
0.0%XVSP cash paid, 1 year
+1.8%MAGY total return, 1 year
+9.2%XVSP total return, 1 year
MAGY9.4 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%26.5% cash9.4 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGS
XVSP9.6 pts ahead of SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY−0.3%XVSP+9.2%9.6 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY−0.3%XVSP+9.2%9.6 pts ahead of SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and XVSP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in MAGYOnly in XVSP
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02%2026-10-23 S&P 500® Mini Index P 1,500.0 304.12%
First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36%2026-10-23 S&P 500® Mini Index C 500.03 110.96%
MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38%Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (Cl 51.81%
2026-10-23 S&P 500® Mini Index C 1,500.0 0.00%
2026-10-23 Space Exploration Technologie 0.00%
2026-10-23 S&P 500® Mini Index P 500.03 -0.04%
2026-09-25 Space Exploration Technologie -0.31%
2026-10-23 Space Exploration Technologie -366.53%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

MAGY and XVSP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
MAGYXVSPMAGYXVSPMAGYXVSP
3 months+3.7%not published6.1%not published−3.9 ptsnot published
6 months+8.1%not published12.9%not published−12.7 ptsnot published
1 year+1.8%not published26.5%not published−9.4 ptsnot published
Since launch+25.6%+9.2%42.0%0.0%−37.5 pts+9.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MAGY and XVSP on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
XVSP
FT Vest SPCX & Target Income ETF
Option income on SPY
IssuerRoundhillFirst Trust
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkMagnificent Seven (MAGS)S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy
Paysweeklynot established
Payout rate, annualized19.2%not published
Expense ratio0.99%not published
Cash paid, 1 year26.5%0.0% (since launch on Aug 26, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−25.3%+9.2%
Total return, 1 year+1.8%+9.2% (since launch on Aug 26, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+11.2%−0.3%
Ahead or behind−9.4 pts+9.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age513 days23 days
Net assets$102m$2m

MAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.

XVSP in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 26, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XVSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.2%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned −0.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 9.6 pts.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGY against XVSP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGY against XVSP, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-xvsp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources