Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

XSHP vs YSPC: which paid, and which earned it?

XSHP and YSPC both write options for income.

Kurv SpaceX (SPAX) Enhanced Income ETF and YieldMax(R) [SpaceX] Option Income Strategy ETF.

7.3%XSHP cash paid, 1 year
10.9%YSPC cash paid, 1 year
−13.1%XSHP total return, 1 year
+6.4%YSPC total return, 1 year
XSHP16.4 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+3.3%XSHP−13.1%16.4 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+3.3%XSHP−13.1%16.4 pts behind SPY
YSPC5.3 pts ahead of SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+1.2%YSPC+6.4%10.9% of it arrived as cash5.3 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+1.2%YSPC+6.4%5.3 pts ahead of SPY

Performance, window by window

XSHP and YSPC over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
XSHPYSPCXSHPYSPCXSHPYSPC
3 months−11.0%not published7.4%not published−13.3 ptsnot published
Since launch−13.1%+6.4%7.3%10.9%−16.4 pts+5.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
XSHP and YSPC on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
XSHP
Kurv SpaceX (SPAX) Enhanced Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
YSPC
YieldMax(R) [SpaceX] Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying weekly
IssuerKurvYieldMax
Strategycovered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxyS&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized33.5%63.0%
Expense ratio0.99%1.01%
Cash paid, 1 year7.3% (since launch on Jun 17, 2026)10.9% (since launch on Jul 15, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−21.8%−5.3%
Total return, 1 year−13.1% (since launch on Jun 17, 2026)+6.4% (since launch on Jul 15, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+3.3%+1.2%
Ahead or behind−16.4 pts+5.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate94%0%
Age93 days65 days
Net assets$7m$32m

XSHP in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jun 17, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XSHP paid 7.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −13.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +3.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 33.5%, paid monthly. Kurv estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

YSPC in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jul 15, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, YSPC paid 10.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +1.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 63.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, XSHP or YSPC?
XSHP charges 0.99% a year and YSPC charges 1.01%, so XSHP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

XSHP against YSPC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, XSHP against YSPC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/xshp-vs-yspc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources