Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
MAGY vs PCOV: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MAGY and PCOV both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MAGY and PCOV
Net assets: $94m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF, and $10m on Nov 2, 2026 for Principal Equity Premium Income ETF.
7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
Total return, distributions reinvested
7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
24.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Not measured
PCOV since launch: paid 1.9%, price −2.0%, total −0.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
PCOV
−0.1%
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
PCOV since launch: paid 1.9%, price −2.0%, total −0.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
PCOV
−0.1%
1.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. PCOV since launch: paid 1.9%, price −2.0%, total −0.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
PCOV costs 0.65 points a year less; MAGY is 9.2 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | MAGY | PCOV |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.5% | not published |
| Price change | fell 26.1% (1 year) | fell 2.0% (since Aug 19, 2026) |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Magnificent Seven, measured through MAGS | not published |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 0.34% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $92m | $10m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | MAGY | PCOV | MAGY | PCOV | MAGY | PCOV |
| 3 months | +4.0% | – | 5.4% | – | +1.2 pts | – |
| 6 months | +0.8% | – | 11.3% | – | −1.8 pts | – |
| 1 year | −1.5% | – | 24.0% | – | −7.8 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: MAGY Apr 2025 · PCOV Aug 2026 | +25.7% | −0.1% | 44.0% | 1.9% | −37.0 pts | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
MAGY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 26.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.1%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
PCOV
Over the period from its first trade on Aug 19, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, PCOV paid 1.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.1%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.2%, paid periodically.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MAGY against PCOV, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-pcov
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). MAGY against PCOV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-pcov
[MAGY against PCOV (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-pcov)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.