Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MAGY vs YYY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year MAGY paid 26.5% of its price in cash against YYY’s 12.1%, though YYY returned more with it reinvested.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF and Amplify CEF High Income ETF.

26.5%MAGY cash paid, 1 year
12.1%YYY cash paid, 1 year
+1.8%MAGY total return, 1 year
+3.4%YYY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: MAGY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

MAGY 22.6YYY 22.33.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

MAGY9.4 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGS
YYY13.2 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%YYY+3.4%12.1% as cash13.2 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%YYY+3.4%13.2 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and YYY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in MAGYOnly in YYY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02%abrdn Healthcare Investors 3.64%
First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36%BlackRock Capital Allocation T 3.56%
MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38%Royce Small-Cap Trust Inc 3.55%
abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend F 3.53%
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure 3.38%
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocati 3.31%
DoubleLine Income Solutions Fu 3.22%
Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fu 3.08%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

MAGY and YYY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
MAGYYYYMAGYYYYMAGYYYY
3 months+3.7%−2.5%6.1%3.1%−3.9 pts−4.8 pts
6 months+8.1%+4.7%12.9%6.5%−12.7 pts−13.3 pts
1 year+1.8%+3.4%26.5%12.1%−9.4 pts−13.2 pts
3 yearsnot published+37.1%not published37.7%not published−41.3 pts
Since launch+25.6%+117.8%42.0%112.4%−37.5 pts−519.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MAGY and YYY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
YYY
Amplify CEF High Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerRoundhillAmplify
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkMagnificent Seven (MAGS)S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized19.2%13.3%
Expense ratio0.99%3.23%
Cash paid, 1 year26.5%12.1%
Price change, 1 year−25.3%−8.8%
Total return, 1 year+1.8%+3.4%
Benchmark return, 1 year+11.2%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−9.4 pts−13.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age513 days5211 days
Net assets$102m$702m

MAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.

YYY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YYY paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, MAGY or YYY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting price in cash and YYY paid 12.1%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, MAGY or YYY?
With every distribution reinvested, MAGY returned +1.8% and YYY returned +3.4% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so YYY returned more.
Which is cheaper, MAGY or YYY?
MAGY charges 0.99% a year and YYY charges 3.23%, so MAGY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGY against YYY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGY against YYY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-yyy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources