Which paid more, JANH or MAGY?

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JANH paid 6.2% of its starting price in cash and MAGY paid 24.0%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, JANH or MAGY?

With every distribution reinvested, JANH returned +6.5% and MAGY −1.5% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, JANH or MAGY?

JANH charges 0.79% a year and MAGY charges 0.99%, so JANH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

JANH vs MAGY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its price in cash against JANH’s 6.2%, though JANH returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about JANH and MAGY

Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $12m for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January and $94m for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF.

JANH on its own →MAGY on its own →

At a glance

6.2%

JANH cash paid, 1 year

24.0%

MAGY cash paid, 1 year

+6.5%

JANH total return, 1 year

−1.5%

MAGY total return, 1 year

JANH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 8.3 pts behind SPY

JANH

+6.5%

SPY

+14.8%

8.3 pts behind SPY

JANH over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +14.8%, −8.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JANH

+6.5%

6.2% of it arrived as cash

8.3 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

8.3 pts behind SPY

JANH over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +14.8%, −8.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JANH

+6.5%

8.3 pts behind SPY

6.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. JANH over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +14.8%, −8.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

MAGY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 7.8 pts behind MAGS

MAGY

−1.5%

MAGS

+6.3%

7.8 pts behind MAGS

MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

MAGS

+6.3%

MAGY

−1.5%

7.8 pts behind MAGS

Total return, distributions reinvested

7.8 pts behind MAGS

MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

MAGS

+6.3%

MAGY

−1.5%

7.8 pts behind MAGS

24.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

JANH costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.0 points; MAGY is 7.8 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

JANH vs MAGY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	JANH	MAGY
Paid and earned
Measure	JANH	MAGY
Total return, 1 year	+6.5%	−1.5%
Price change, 1 year	rose 0.1%	fell 26.1%
Return of capital, issuer estimate	50% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment	100% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	JANH	MAGY
Benchmark	S&P 500, measured through SPY	Magnificent Seven, measured through MAGS
Cost and size
Measure	JANH	MAGY
Expense ratio	0.79%	0.99%
Net assets	$12m	$94m
Holdings
Measure	JANH	MAGY
Holdings in common	0%

ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · JANH scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?

IQ Income Score61.1JANH17.1MAGY

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

JANH 61.1

MAGY 17.1

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, JANH and MAGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first JANH MAGY

Only in one fund ↓

Only in JANH

Only in MAGY

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.12%

MAGS 11/06/2026 71.22 C -0.47%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

JANH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF · Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly

Issuer Innovator Roundhill

Strategy defined income covered call

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) Magnificent Seven (MAGS)

Pays quarterly weekly

Payout rate, annualized 6.2% 25.1%

Expense ratio 0.79% 0.99%

Cash paid, 1 year 6.2% 24.0%

Price change, 1 year +0.1% −26.1%

Total return, 1 year +6.5% −1.5%

Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +6.3%

Ahead or behind −8.3 pts −7.8 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate 50% 100%

Age 2.8 years 1.5 years

Net assets $12m $94m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: JANH vs MAGY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	JANH	MAGY	JANH	MAGY	JANH	MAGY
3 months	+1.3%	+4.0%	1.6%	5.4%	+1.4 pts	+1.2 pts
6 months	+3.3%	+0.8%	3.1%	11.3%	−1.7 pts	−1.8 pts
1 year	+6.5%	−1.5%	6.2%	24.0%	−8.3 pts	−7.8 pts
Since launchNot the same days: JANH Jan 2024 · MAGY Apr 2025	+20.6%	+25.7%	17.7%	44.0%	−47.0 pts	−37.0 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

JANH

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JANH paid 6.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.2%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 50% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

MAGY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 26.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.1%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, JANH or MAGY?: Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JANH paid 6.2% of its starting price in cash and MAGY paid 24.0%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, JANH or MAGY?: With every distribution reinvested, JANH returned +6.5% and MAGY −1.5% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, JANH or MAGY?: JANH charges 0.79% a year and MAGY charges 0.99%, so JANH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

JANH vs QVOL JANH vs KYLD JANH vs YSPC JANH vs OARK MAGY vs JULJ MAGY vs JANJ MAGY vs OCTJ MAGY vs OCTH

Where to next

S&P 500 (SPY) →Magnificent Seven (MAGS) →JANH on its own →MAGY on its own →JANH dividend history →MAGY dividend history →MAGY holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

JANH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

JANH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

JANH 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Innovator page for JANH ↗

MAGY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

MAGY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

MAGY 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Roundhill page for MAGY ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JANH against MAGY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/janh-vs-magy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.