Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
MAGY vs OCTJ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its price in cash against OCTJ’s 5.3%, though OCTJ returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MAGY and OCTJ
Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $94m for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF and $15m for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - October.
7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
Total return, distributions reinvested
7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
24.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.9 pts behind SPY
OCTJ over 1 year: paid 5.3%, price +0.3%, total +5.8%, SPY +14.8%, −9.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
OCTJ
+5.8%
5.3% of it arrived as cash
9 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
9 pts behind SPY
OCTJ over 1 year: paid 5.3%, price +0.3%, total +5.8%, SPY +14.8%, −9.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
OCTJ
+5.8%
9 pts behind SPY
5.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. OCTJ over 1 year: paid 5.3%, price +0.3%, total +5.8%, SPY +14.8%, −9.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
OCTJ costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.3 points; MAGY is 6.3 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | MAGY | OCTJ |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.5% | +5.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 26.1% | rose 0.3% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment | 36% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Magnificent Seven, measured through MAGS | S&P 500, measured through SPY |
| Against its benchmark, same days | behind by 7.8 pts | behind by 9.0 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 0.79% |
| Net assets | $94m | $15m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and OCTJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | MAGY | OCTJ | MAGY | OCTJ | MAGY | OCTJ |
| 3 months | +4.0% | +1.0% | 5.4% | 1.3% | +1.2 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +0.8% | +2.4% | 11.3% | 2.6% | −1.8 pts | −2.7 pts |
| 1 year | −1.5% | +5.8% | 24.0% | 5.3% | −7.8 pts | −9.0 pts |
| 3 years | – | +18.1% | – | 17.0% | – | −64.8 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: MAGY Apr 2025 · OCTJ Oct 2023 | +25.7% | +19.6% | 44.0% | 17.2% | −37.0 pts | −66.5 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
MAGY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 26.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.1%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
OCTJ
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OCTJ paid 5.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 36% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MAGY against OCTJ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-octj
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). MAGY against OCTJ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-octj
[MAGY against OCTJ (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-octj)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.