Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACKY vs MAGY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year MAGY paid 26.5% of its price in cash against ACKY’s 13.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.

VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF.

13.9%ACKY cash paid, 1 year
26.5%MAGY cash paid, 1 year
−1.3%ACKY total return, 1 year
+1.8%MAGY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: MAGY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

ACKY 12.7MAGY 22.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

ACKY17.9 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%ACKY−1.3%17.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%ACKY−1.3%17.9 pts behind SPY
MAGY9.4 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGS

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACKY and MAGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ACKYOnly in MAGY
Microsoft Corp 11.56%Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02%
Brookfield Corp 11.16%First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36%
Uber Technologies Inc 10.74%MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38%
Pershing Square USA Ltd 10.50%
Meta Platforms Inc 10.23%
Amazon.com Inc 9.95%
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc 8.86%
Restaurant Brands International Inc 8.22%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ACKY and MAGY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ACKYMAGYACKYMAGYACKYMAGY
3 months+0.8%+3.7%3.7%6.1%−1.5 pts−3.9 pts
6 months+5.8%+8.1%7.7%12.9%−12.2 pts−12.7 pts
1 year−1.3%+1.8%13.9%26.5%−17.9 pts−9.4 pts
Since launch−0.4%+25.6%14.0%42.0%−19.1 pts−37.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACKY and MAGY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACKY
VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
IssuerVistaSharesRoundhill
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyMagnificent Seven (MAGS)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized15.7%19.2%
Expense ratio0.95%0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year13.9%26.5%
Price change, 1 year−15.1%−25.3%
Total return, 1 year−1.3%+1.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+11.2%
Ahead or behind−17.9 pts−9.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age374 days513 days
Net assets$45m$102m

ACKY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ACKY paid 13.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 15.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 17.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.7%, paid monthly.

MAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ACKY or MAGY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ACKY paid 13.9% of its starting price in cash and MAGY paid 26.5%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACKY or MAGY?
With every distribution reinvested, ACKY returned −1.3% and MAGY returned +1.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so MAGY returned more.
Which is cheaper, ACKY or MAGY?
ACKY charges 0.95% a year and MAGY charges 0.99%, so ACKY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACKY against MAGY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACKY against MAGY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acky-vs-magy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources