Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MAGY vs OEI: which paid, and which earned it?

MAGY and OEI both write options for income.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF and Optimized Equity Income ETF.

26.5%MAGY cash paid, 1 year
8.6%OEI cash paid, 1 year
+1.8%MAGY total return, 1 year
+14.4%OEI total return, 1 year
MAGY9.4 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGS
OEI0.9 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+15.3%OEI+14.4%8.6% of it arrived as cash0.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+15.3%OEI+14.4%8.6% cash0.9 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and OEI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in MAGYOnly in OEI
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02%NVIDIA Corp 8.32%
First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36%Microsoft Corp 5.99%
MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38%Amazon.com Inc 4.56%
Apple Inc 4.28%
Alphabet Inc 3.48%
Broadcom Inc 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 2.79%
Micron Technology Inc 2.57%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

MAGY and OEI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
MAGYOEIMAGYOEIMAGYOEI
3 months+3.7%+4.8%6.1%2.3%−3.9 pts+2.5 pts
6 months+8.1%+12.5%12.9%4.9%−12.7 pts−5.6 pts
1 year+1.8%not published26.5%not published−9.4 ptsnot published
Since launch+25.6%+14.4%42.0%8.6%−37.5 pts−0.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MAGY and OEI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
OEI
Optimized Equity Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerRoundhillCore Alternative
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkMagnificent Seven (MAGS)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized19.2%9.2%
Expense ratio0.99%1.02%
Cash paid, 1 year26.5%8.6% (since launch on Oct 22, 2025)
Price change, 1 year−25.3%+5.2%
Total return, 1 year+1.8%+14.4% (since launch on Oct 22, 2025)
Benchmark return, 1 year+11.2%+15.3%
Ahead or behind−9.4 pts−0.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age513 days331 days
Net assets$102m$46m

MAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.

OEI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Oct 22, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, OEI paid 8.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +15.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.2%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, MAGY or OEI?
MAGY charges 0.99% a year and OEI charges 1.02%, so MAGY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGY against OEI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGY against OEI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-oei Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources