Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MAGY vs SPYI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year MAGY paid 26.5% of its price in cash against SPYI’s 13.1%, though SPYI returned more with it reinvested.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF and NEOS S&P 500(R) High Income ETF.

26.5%MAGY cash paid, 1 year
13.1%SPYI cash paid, 1 year
+1.8%MAGY total return, 1 year
+15.3%SPYI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: SPYI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

MAGY 22.6SPYI 62.53.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

MAGY9.4 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGS
SPYI1.2 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%SPYI+15.3%13.1% of it arrived as cash1.2 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%SPYI+15.3%13.1% as cash1.2 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and SPYI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in MAGYOnly in SPYI
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02%NVIDIA Corp 7.57%
First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36%Apple Inc 6.59%
MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38%Microsoft Corp 4.32%
Amazon.com Inc 3.65%
Alphabet Inc 3.28%
Broadcom Inc 2.80%
Alphabet Inc 2.61%
Micron Technology Inc 1.99%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

MAGY and SPYI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
MAGYSPYIMAGYSPYIMAGYSPYI
3 months+3.7%+3.1%6.1%3.0%−3.9 pts+0.9 pts
6 months+8.1%+14.4%12.9%6.5%−12.7 pts−3.6 pts
1 year+1.8%+15.3%26.5%13.1%−9.4 pts−1.2 pts
3 yearsnot published+57.2%not published38.6%not published−21.2 pts
Since launch+25.6%+77.1%42.0%50.3%−37.5 pts−25.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MAGY and SPYI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500(R) High Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerRoundhillNEOS
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkMagnificent Seven (MAGS)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized19.2%12.1%
Expense ratio0.99%0.68%
Cash paid, 1 year26.5%13.1%
Price change, 1 year−25.3%+1.2%
Total return, 1 year+1.8%+15.3%
Benchmark return, 1 year+11.2%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−9.4 pts−1.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published93%
Age513 days1480 days
Net assets$102m$12.2bn

MAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.

SPYI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SPYI paid 13.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.1%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, MAGY or SPYI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting price in cash and SPYI paid 13.1%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, MAGY or SPYI?
With every distribution reinvested, MAGY returned +1.8% and SPYI returned +15.3% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so SPYI returned more.
Which is cheaper, MAGY or SPYI?
MAGY charges 0.99% a year and SPYI charges 0.68%, so SPYI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGY against SPYI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGY against SPYI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-spyi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources