Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

MAGY vs XYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its price in cash against XYLD’s 10.7%, though XYLD returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MAGY and XYLD

Net assets: $94m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF, and $3.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF.

At a glance
24.0%
MAGY cash paid, 1 year
10.7%
XYLD cash paid, 1 year
−1.5%
MAGY total return, 1 year
+15.9%
XYLD total return, 1 year
MAGY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY
−1.5%
MAGS
+6.3%

7.8 pts behind MAGS

MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

MAGS

+6.3%

MAGY

−1.5%

7.8 pts behind MAGS

Total return, distributions reinvested

7.8 pts behind MAGS

MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

MAGS

+6.3%

MAGY

−1.5%

7.8 pts behind MAGS

24.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
XYLD · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.1 pts ahead of SPY
XYLD
+15.9%
SPY
+14.8%

1.1 pts ahead of SPY

XYLD over 1 year: paid 10.7%, price +4.4%, total +15.9%, SPY +14.8%, +1.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

XYLD

+15.9%

10.7% of it arrived as cash

1.1 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.1 pts ahead of SPY

XYLD over 1 year: paid 10.7%, price +4.4%, total +15.9%, SPY +14.8%, +1.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

XYLD

+15.9%

10.7% cash

1.1 pts ahead of SPY

10.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. XYLD over 1 year: paid 10.7%, price +4.4%, total +15.9%, SPY +14.8%, +1.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

XYLD costs 0.39 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.4 points; XYLD is far larger, $3.4bn against $99m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

MAGY vs XYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureMAGYXYLD
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year−1.5%+15.9%
Price change, 1 yearfell 26.1%rose 4.4%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment93% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkMagnificent Seven, measured through MAGSS&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.99%0.60%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$99m$3.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · XYLD scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score17.1MAGY77.5XYLD

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and XYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MAGY XYLD
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.12%
MAGS 11/06/2026 71.22 C -0.47%
Only in XYLD
NVIDIA CORPORATION 7.64%
APPLE INC. 7.13%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.42%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 4.18%
ALPHABET INC. 3.28%
BROADCOM INC. 2.90%
ALPHABET INC. 2.65%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.92%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF · Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
Strategy covered call covered call
Benchmark Magnificent Seven (MAGS) S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays weekly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 25.1% 9.1%
Expense ratio 0.99% 0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year 24.0% 10.7%
Price change, 1 year −26.1% +4.4%
Total return, 1 year −1.5% +15.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year +6.3% +14.8%
Ahead or behind −7.8 pts +1.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 100% 93%
Age 1.5 years 13.4 years
Net assets, MAGY as of Nov 4, 2026 and XYLD as of Oct 12, 2026 $94m $3.4bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: MAGY vs XYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowMAGYXYLDMAGYXYLDMAGYXYLD
3 months+4.0%+2.4%5.4%2.2%+1.2 pts+2.6 pts
6 months+0.8%+7.9%11.3%5.1%−1.8 pts+2.9 pts
1 year−1.5%+15.9%24.0%10.7%−7.8 pts+1.1 pts
3 years–+48.4%–34.0%–−34.5 pts
Since launchNot the same days: MAGY Apr 2025 · XYLD Jun 2013+25.7%+194.8%44.0%114.5%−37.0 pts−316.0 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

MAGY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MAGY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 26.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.1%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

XYLD

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, XYLD paid 10.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.1 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, MAGY or XYLD?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting price in cash and XYLD paid 10.7%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, MAGY or XYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, MAGY returned −1.5% and XYLD +15.9% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, MAGY or XYLD?
MAGY charges 0.99% a year and XYLD charges 0.60%, so XYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MAGY against XYLD, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-xyld

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.