Data as of .
XYLD vs YSPC: which paid, and which earned it?
XYLD and YSPC both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, XYLD and YSPC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in XYLD | Only in YSPC |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 8.24% | United States Treasury Bill 07/08/2027 43.24% |
| APPLE INC 7.55% | United States Treasury Bill 02/18/2027 34.02% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.61% | United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 16.09% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 3.83% | SPCX 10/16/2026 150.01 C 6.39% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.13% | First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 5.82% |
| BROADCOM INC 2.62% | SPACE EX CLL OPT 09/26 162.500 0.62% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL C 2.49% | SPACE EX CLL OPT 09/26 157.500 0.07% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 2.26% | SPACE EX CLL OPT 09/26 152.500 -0.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XYLD | YSPC | XYLD | YSPC | XYLD | YSPC | |
| 3 months | +4.5% | not published | 2.6% | not published | +2.3 pts | not published |
| 6 months | +12.4% | not published | 5.6% | not published | −5.6 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +17.9% | not published | 11.0% | not published | +1.4 pts | not published |
| 3 years | +44.5% | not published | 32.5% | not published | −33.9 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +191.5% | +6.4% | 112.9% | 10.9% | −315.3 pts | +5.3 pts |
| XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | YSPC YieldMax(R) [SpaceX] Option Income Strategy ETF Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 8.9% | 63.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 1.01% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.0% | 10.9% (since launch on Jul 15, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | +5.9% | −5.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.9% | +6.4% (since launch on Jul 15, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +1.2% |
| Ahead or behind | +1.4 pts | +5.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 93% | 0% |
| Age | 4834 days | 65 days |
| Net assets | $3.4bn | $32m |
XYLD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XYLD paid 11.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.9%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
YSPC in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jul 15, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, YSPC paid 10.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +1.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 63.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, XYLD or YSPC?
- XYLD charges 0.60% a year and YSPC charges 1.01%, so XYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, XYLD against YSPC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/xyld-vs-yspc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.